| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsPunctatisporites R. Potonié & Gelletich, 1933 †
11923263 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11923263)
unaccepted (nomen rejiciendum)
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Original spelling Punctati-sporites, the hyphen now (since 2017: Shenzhen Code, Art. 60.12) treated as a correctable error....
Taxonomic remark Original spelling Punctati-sporites, the hyphen now (since 2017: Shenzhen Code, Art. 60.12) treated as a correctable error. Previously believed by workers to post-date Punctatisporites (original spelling Punctati-sporites) A.C. Ibrahim, 1933, however discovered by Doweld to have been published first; Doweld, 2017 then proposed that this name (based on a different species, now in Lygodiumsporites) be rejected in favour of Punctatisporites (original spelling Punctati-sporites) A.C. Ibrahim, 1933, a proposal that was accepted by the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils (Herendeen, 2020). [details]
IRMNG (2022). Punctatisporites R. Potonié & Gelletich, 1933 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11923263 on 2024-06-12
Date action by
basis of record
Herendeen, P. S. (2020). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 12. <em>Taxon.</em> 69(1): 193-197., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12194 [details]
additional source Doweld, A. (2017). (2501) Proposal to conserve the name Punctatisporites Ibrahim with unhyphenated spelling against Punctati-sporites R. Potonié & Gelletich (fossil plants). <em>Taxon.</em> 66(1): 209-210., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/661.29 note: as nom. rej. prop. [details] source of synonymy Doweld, A. (2017). (2501) Proposal to conserve the name Punctatisporites Ibrahim with unhyphenated spelling against Punctati-sporites R. Potonié & Gelletich (fossil plants). <em>Taxon.</em> 66(1): 209-210., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/661.29 [details] status source Herendeen, P. S. (2020). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 12. <em>Taxon.</em> 69(1): 193-197., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12194 [details] verified source for family Herendeen, P. S. (2020). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 12. <em>Taxon.</em> 69(1): 193-197., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12194 [details] name verified source Herendeen, P. S. (2020). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 12. <em>Taxon.</em> 69(1): 193-197., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12194 [details] extant flag source Herendeen, P. S. (2020). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 12. <em>Taxon.</em> 69(1): 193-197., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12194 [details] habitat flag source Herendeen, P. S. (2020). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 12. <em>Taxon.</em> 69(1): 193-197., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12194 [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark Original spelling Punctati-sporites, the hyphen now (since 2017: Shenzhen Code, Art. 60.12) treated as a correctable error. Previously believed by workers to post-date Punctatisporites (original spelling Punctati-sporites) A.C. Ibrahim, 1933, however discovered by Doweld to have been published first; Doweld, 2017 then proposed that this name (based on a different species, now in Lygodiumsporites) be rejected in favour of Punctatisporites (original spelling Punctati-sporites) A.C. Ibrahim, 1933, a proposal that was accepted by the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils (Herendeen, 2020). [details]
|
