| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsGlossopteris (A.T. Brongniart) Sternberg, 1825 †
1076658 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1076658)
unaccepted
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Basionym: Filicites sect. Glossopteris A.T. Brongniart, 1822. From Cleal & Thomas, 2018: The type of Filicites...
Taxonomic remark Basionym: Filicites sect. Glossopteris A.T. Brongniart, 1822. From Cleal & Thomas, 2018: The type of Filicites (Glossopteris) was later re-interpreted by Brongniart (1828a: 87) as a leaf (now regarded as a cone sporophyll) of an arborescent lycopsid, and as a result used the name Glossopteris for a completely different type of leaf with often anastomosing lateral veins. Brongniart’s (1828a) use of the name is widely accepted today (e.g. Chandra and Surange 1979) and to avoid it being supressed in favour of the earlier (1822a) homonym (also of the even earlier homonym Glossopteris Rafinesque, 1815) the former has been listed as a conserved name with a conserved type since the Paris ICBN (Stafleu 1957). [details]
IRMNG (2023). Glossopteris (A.T. Brongniart) Sternberg, 1825 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1076658 on 2024-04-24
Date action by
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
additional source Cleal, C. J.; Thomas, B. A. (2018). Nomenclatural status of the palaeobotanical "artificial taxa" established in Brongniart's 1822 “Classification” paper. <em>Fossil Imprint.</em> 74(1-2): 9-28., available online at https://doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0001 [details] source of synonymy Doweld, A. B. (2012). (2093) Proposal to conserve the name Pecopteris against Filicites (fossil Botryopteridiopsida (Pteridophyta)). <em>Taxon.</em> 61: 1126-1127., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615029 [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] extant flag source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark Basionym: Filicites sect. Glossopteris A.T. Brongniart, 1822. From Cleal & Thomas, 2018: The type of Filicites (Glossopteris) was later re-interpreted by Brongniart (1828a: 87) as a leaf (now regarded as a cone sporophyll) of an arborescent lycopsid, and as a result used the name Glossopteris for a completely different type of leaf with often anastomosing lateral veins. Brongniart’s (1828a) use of the name is widely accepted today (e.g. Chandra and Surange 1979) and to avoid it being supressed in favour of the earlier (1822a) homonym (also of the even earlier homonym Glossopteris Rafinesque, 1815) the former has been listed as a conserved name with a conserved type since the Paris ICBN (Stafleu 1957). [details]
|
