| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsMattborgus Hoser, 2013
1482476 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1482476)
unaccepted
Genus
recent only
Article title: In praise of subgenera, with ethics and within the rules of zoology: taxonomic status of the snake genera Calliophis Gray, 1835, Liophidium Boulenger, 1896 and Liopholidophis Mocquard, 1904 (Serpentes). [details]
Australasian Journal of Herpetology 17: -. [35-50] [details]
Taxonomic remark As Liophidium (Mattborgus). Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the...
Taxonomic remark As Liophidium (Mattborgus). Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not generally accepted. For the present status of this name, the reader is suggested to consult the Reptile Data [details]
IRMNG (2021). Mattborgus Hoser, 2013. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1482476 on 2024-04-18
Date action by
original description
Article title: In praise of subgenera, with ethics and within the rules of zoology: taxonomic status of the snake genera Calliophis Gray, 1835, Liophidium Boulenger, 1896 and Liopholidophis Mocquard, 1904 (Serpentes). [details]
original description Australasian Journal of Herpetology 17: -. [35-50] [details] basis of record www.organismnames.com (Mar 2015) / web search [details] additional source As per current placement of type species [details] source of synonymy original publication/web search (AJR). [details] extant flag source inferred from original work (title) [details] habitat flag source inferred from original work (title)/web search (AJR) [details] From other sources
Classification Animalia;Chordata;Vertebrata;Reptilia;Lepidosauria;Squamata;Serpentes;Colubridae [details]Taxonomic remark As Liophidium (Mattborgus). Editor's note: names proposed by R. Hoser (2000 onwards) are controversial within the herpetological community and not generally accepted. For the present status of this name, the reader is suggested to consult the Reptile Data [details] |
