| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsAenigmapollis E.A. Stanley, 1965 †
1079475 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1079475)
unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Srivastava, 1981 included this genus in the synonymy of Kurtzipites Anderson, however subsequently (Srivastava & Braman,...
Taxonomic remark Srivastava, 1981 included this genus in the synonymy of Kurtzipites Anderson, however subsequently (Srivastava & Braman, 2013) considered the type species, A. polyformis Stanley, 1965 to be a synonym of Aquilapollenites minutus Srivastava, 1966, which is curious because one would expect either A polyformis or Kurtzipites trispissatus Anderson, 1960 to have priority. Additionally, other recent workers treat Kurtzipites as an accepted genus. The correct synonymy of this name should most likely be researched further. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Aenigmapollis E.A. Stanley, 1965 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1079475 on 2024-11-22
Date action by
additional source
Srivastava, S. K. (1981). Fossil pollen genus Kurtzipites Anderson. <em>Journal of Paleontology.</em> 55(4): 868-879., available online at https://doi.org/10.2307/1304435
note: as syn. of Kurtzipites [details] source of synonymy Srivastava, S. K.; Braman, D. R. (2013). The palynostratigraphy of the Edmonton Group (Upper Cretaceous) of Alberta, Canada. <em>Palynology.</em> 37(1): 1-27., available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/01916122.2012.673288 [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Paleocene. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark Srivastava, 1981 included this genus in the synonymy of Kurtzipites Anderson, however subsequently (Srivastava & Braman, 2013) considered the type species, A. polyformis Stanley, 1965 to be a synonym of Aquilapollenites minutus Srivastava, 1966, which is curious because one would expect either A polyformis or Kurtzipites trispissatus Anderson, 1960 to have priority. Additionally, other recent workers treat Kurtzipites as an accepted genus. The correct synonymy of this name should most likely be researched further. [details] |
