| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsBukryella T.V. Desikachary & P. Prema in P. Prema, 1996 †
1262396 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1262396)
unaccepted
Genus
marine,
fossil only
Bibl Phycol 100
page(s): 167 [details]
Taxonomic remark Not included in Parkinson's, 2002 list of nominal genera of silicoflagellate morphotaxa. From that work: In essence,...
Taxonomic remark Not included in Parkinson's, 2002 list of nominal genera of silicoflagellate morphotaxa. From that work: In essence, Bukryella is a three-sided morph of Hannaites, lacking the fibuloid apical structure of that genus, which is also of Eocene age. Whether Bukryella is really distinct from Hannaites (they are assigned to different families) is uncertain as Bukryella may simply represent a three-sided morph of Hannaites, suggesting another instance of confusion between ontogeny and morphology. The separation of Bukryella from Hannaites was indicated as provisional (“For the present, we would separate the triangular forms with spherical protuberances at angles into a separate genus” p. 168), and is an artefact of the familial classification. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Bukryella T.V. Desikachary & P. Prema in P. Prema, 1996 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1262396 on 2024-11-16
Date action by
original description
Bibl Phycol 100
page(s): 167 [details] basis of record CoL2006/AlgaeBase [details] basis of record Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details] basis of record Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] source of synonymy Parkinson, P. (2002). Ontogeny v. phylogeny: the strange case of the silicoflagellates. <em>Constancea.</em> 83., available online at https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/constancea/83/parkinson/Dictyocha.html note: inferred (refer note) [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] extant flag source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] habitat flag source web search (AJR) [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Eocene. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark Not included in Parkinson's, 2002 list of nominal genera of silicoflagellate morphotaxa. From that work: In essence, Bukryella is a three-sided morph of Hannaites, lacking the fibuloid apical structure of that genus, which is also of Eocene age. Whether Bukryella is really distinct from Hannaites (they are assigned to different families) is uncertain as Bukryella may simply represent a three-sided morph of Hannaites, suggesting another instance of confusion between ontogeny and morphology. The separation of Bukryella from Hannaites was indicated as provisional (“For the present, we would separate the triangular forms with spherical protuberances at angles into a separate genus” p. 168), and is an artefact of the familial classification. [details] |
