Listed as accepted in Hyde et al., 2024, although possibly not validly published: art. 29.1 ex. 5: supplementary ... [details]
Not accepted in Hyde et al., 2024 who place Arthrobotrys in Orbiliaceae, however MycoBank (2025) lists ... [details]
Mot listed in Hyde et al. (2024) [details]
Treated as a accepted in Hyde et al., 2024, although a nom. inval. (Art. 41.1: Latin description or diagnosis ... [details]
Places in Pisorisporiaceae as neither the original author nor those of the 2024 Outline of Fungi provide any ... [details]
Listed as Hymenochaetales incertae sedis in Hyde et al., 2024 with no clear justification. [details]
Hyde et al., 2024 give authorship as Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde; Index Fungorum (2025 version) gives Hubka & Réblová ... [details]
Guo et al., 2024 suggest that Cudoniaceae is a synonym of / should be included within Rhytismataceae, however it is ... [details]
From Hyde et al., 2024: Dematioscypha Svrček [is] protected over Haplographium Berk. & Broome and Schizocephalum ... [details]
Authorship previously given in error as Spegazzini, 1920, nom. nud. (from Index Fungorum, 2009 and Kirk et al., ... [details]
This form ("Eurychasmales Sparrow") is used in Hyde et al., 2024, however according to Index Fungorum ... [details]
This name (as "Eurychasmales Sparrow") is used in Hyde et al., 2024, however according to Index Fungorum ... [details]
Gigasporales Sieverd., G.A. Silva, B.T. Goto & Oehl, Mycotaxon 116: 373 (2011) is an isonym (same name later ... [details]
Family not recognised in Hyde et al., 2024 (who place Hydrocina in Helotiales incertae sedis), but retained at this ... [details]
Treated in Ruggiero et al., 2015 as a class (Hyphochytrea) within phylum "Pseudofungi [= Oomycota]", however as a ... [details]
From Hyde et al., 2024: Induratia Samuels, E. Müll. & Petrini ... The taxonomic placement is based on multi-locus ... [details]
Included genera previously in Asterinaceae; distinct family status confirmed by recent molecular work, refer Hyde et ... [details]
The genus is maintained in Teloschistaceae per Mycobank, as Hyde et al. (2024) provide no justification for moving ... [details]
Genus listed in IRMNG as accepted per inclusion in Hyde et al., 2024 list, although an invalid name per MycoBank ... [details]
Included as accepted family in Hyde et al., 2024, although type genus possibly invalid at the time. From ... [details]
Not listed in Hyde et al., 2024, but included as an accepted genus in MycoBank (2025) and Index Fungorum (2025). [details]
Listed as a nom. inval. in Hyde et al., 2024, although included as an accepted name in MycoBank (2025) and Index ... [details]
Attribution to Dick (no stated year given) follows Hyde et al., 2024, however Index Fungorum gives authorship as ... [details]
not listed in Hyde & al. 2024 [details]
Hyde et al., 2024 place Phylliscum and allies in Lichinaceae, but the work of Prieto et al., 2024 may supersede this. [details]
Included in Lichinaceae in Hyde et al., 2024, however Prieto et al., 2024 retain as valid family [details]
This spelling (Protosteliida) is used in Hyde et al., 2024 and some other sources, however the form Protostelida ... [details]
Name incorrectly formed cf. type genus, Pseudodiploospora; Pseudodiploosporaceae is correct. [details]
Not list5ed in Hyde et al., 2024 [details]
Possibly unavailable (art. 29.1 ex. 5: supplementary material are not "electronic material distributed in an online ... [details]
A nomen novum for Spiromastix Kuehn & G.F. Orr, 1962, non Spiromastix Perfiliev, 1929 (Algae), however Hirooka et ... [details]
Family used in Hyde et al., 2024 (as "Stellarchytriaceae Bennett et al."), although possibly not formally proposed. [details]