| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsOnthoecus Lacordaire, 1856
11916326 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11916326)
unaccepted > unavailable name (published as synonym, not validated prior to 1961)
Genus
Onthoecus Dejean, 1833 · unaccepted > nomen nudum
terrestrial
recent only
masculine
Hist. Nat. Ins., Gen. Col., 3
page(s): 103 [details]
Taxonomic remark Cupello and Génier (2017) are correct that Arnaud & Génier (2016)'s are wrong in asserting the availability of the name...
Taxonomic remark Cupello and Génier (2017) are correct that Arnaud & Génier (2016)'s are wrong in asserting the availability of the name from Lacordaire, 1856. They are NOT correct in (seemingly) asserting that no type species was assigned, as Arnaud and Génier very clearly assign Dendropaemon amyntas Harold, 1868 as a type. What makes Onthoecus Arnaud and Génier unavailable is that it was not expressly proposed as new (Art. 16.1). [details]
IRMNG (2023). Onthoecus Lacordaire, 1856. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11916326 on 2024-04-19
Date action by
original description
Hist. Nat. Ins., Gen. Col., 3
page(s): 103 [details] status source Cupello, M. & Génier, F. (2017). Dendropaemon Perty, 1830 Nomenclature Revisited: on The Unavailability of “Onthoecus Lacordaire, 1856″ (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae: Phanaeini). <em>The Coleopterists Bulletin.</em> 71(4): 821-824., available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322234664 [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark Cupello and Génier (2017) are correct that Arnaud & Génier (2016)'s are wrong in asserting the availability of the name from Lacordaire, 1856. They are NOT correct in (seemingly) asserting that no type species was assigned, as Arnaud and Génier very clearly assign Dendropaemon amyntas Harold, 1868 as a type. What makes Onthoecus Arnaud and Génier unavailable is that it was not expressly proposed as new (Art. 16.1). [details]
|
