| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsCelastrophyllum Göppert ex Heer, 1882 †
Celastrophyllum Göppert, 1854 † · unaccepted > unavailable name (not validly published)
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark In response to a request for a ruling by Doweld, 2017, in 2020 the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils determined that...
Taxonomic remark In response to a request for a ruling by Doweld, 2017, in 2020 the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils determined that Celastrophyllum Göpp., 1854 lacked sufficient description for a valid publication, as did Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Saporta & Marion, 1873 and Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Schimp., 1874, making the earliest valid publication of this genus name that by Heer, 1882. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Celastrophyllum Göppert ex Heer, 1882 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11923333 on 2024-04-23
Date action by
basis of record
Doweld, A. B. (2017). (60–62) Requests for binding decisions on the descriptive statements associated with Celastrophyllum Göpp., Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Saporta & Marion, and Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Schimp. (fossil plants). <em>Taxon.</em> 66(6): 1484-1485., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/666.28 [details]
verified source for family Doweld, A. B. (2017). (60–62) Requests for binding decisions on the descriptive statements associated with Celastrophyllum Göpp., Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Saporta & Marion, and Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Schimp. (fossil plants). <em>Taxon.</em> 66(6): 1484-1485., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/666.28 [details] name verified source Doweld, A. B. (2017). (60–62) Requests for binding decisions on the descriptive statements associated with Celastrophyllum Göpp., Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Saporta & Marion, and Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Schimp. (fossil plants). <em>Taxon.</em> 66(6): 1484-1485., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/666.28 [details] current name source Herendeen, P. S. (2020). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 13. <em>Taxon.</em> 69(2): 398-402., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12218 [details] extant flag source Doweld, A. B. (2017). (60–62) Requests for binding decisions on the descriptive statements associated with Celastrophyllum Göpp., Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Saporta & Marion, and Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Schimp. (fossil plants). <em>Taxon.</em> 66(6): 1484-1485., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/666.28 [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark In response to a request for a ruling by Doweld, 2017, in 2020 the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils determined that Celastrophyllum Göpp., 1854 lacked sufficient description for a valid publication, as did Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Saporta & Marion, 1873 and Celastrophyllum Ettingsh. ex Schimp., 1874, making the earliest valid publication of this genus name that by Heer, 1882. [details]
|
