Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG name details

Sclerotites Geinitz, 1842 †

11966518 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11966518)

 unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Genus
Sclerotites Geinitz, 1845 † · unaccepted (listed as a new genus in error in...)  
listed as a new genus in error in Nomenclator Zoologicus (later usage of Sclerotites Geinitz, 1842)
marine
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Described as fossil fungus (thus falling under the botanical Code), but appears to be a boring (in fossil wood) hence...  
Taxonomic remark Described as fossil fungus (thus falling under the botanical Code), but appears to be a boring (in fossil wood) hence allocated to Trace Fossils (zoological category) in IRMNG. No specific name was associated with this genus on its description, which however does not appear to prevent it being validly published (per IFPNI record). [details]
IRMNG (2026). Sclerotites Geinitz, 1842 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11966518 on 2026-06-25
Date
action
by
2026-02-17 17:30:42Z
created
2026-02-18 17:40:19Z
changed
2026-02-21 04:03:35Z
changed

basis of record IFPNI International Editorial Board. (2014-current). The International Fossil Plant Names Index. Available online at http://www.fossilplants.info. [details] 

source of synonymy Niebuhr, B.; Schneider, S.; Wilmsen, M. (2014). 5. Muscheln / 5. Bivalves. <em>Geologica Saxonica.</em> 60(1): 83-168., available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284571596
note: mentioned in passing [details] 

name verified source IFPNI International Editorial Board. (2014-current). The International Fossil Plant Names Index. Available online at http://www.fossilplants.info. [details] 

extant flag source IFPNI International Editorial Board. (2014-current). The International Fossil Plant Names Index. Available online at http://www.fossilplants.info. [details] 
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Described as fossil fungus (thus falling under the botanical Code), but appears to be a boring (in fossil wood) hence allocated to Trace Fossils (zoological category) in IRMNG. No specific name was associated with this genus on its description, which however does not appear to prevent it being validly published (per IFPNI record). [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»