IRMNG taxon details
original description
J. R. Micros. Soc., 59 page(s): 167 [details]
basis of record
Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details]
basis of record
SN2000/J.J. Lee et al., 2000 [details]
additional source
Vachard, D.; Krainer, K.; Lucas, S. (2015). Late Early Permian (late Leonardian; Kungurian) algae, microproblematica, and smaller foraminifers from the Yeso Group and San Andres Formation (New Mexico; USA). <em>Palaeontologia Electronica.</em> 18(1): 1-77., available online at https://doi.org/10.26879/433 note: listed in family Tubiphytidae (Microproblematica), but see note [details]
verified source for family
WoRMS (Mar 2013) note: as foraminifer (Nubeculariidae), refer note [details]
name verified source
Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details]
extant flag source
Sepkoski, J. J., Jr. (2002). A compendium of fossil marine animal genera. <em>Bulletins of American Paleontology.</em> 363, 1-560. [details]
habitat flag source
Sepkoski, J. J., Jr. (2002). A compendium of fossil marine animal genera. <em>Bulletins of American Paleontology.</em> 363, 1-560. [details]
original description
(of Foraminella Bogdanovich, 1960) Vop. Mikropaleont. 3 page(s): 19 [details]
Unverified
Descriptive info Marine, extant (?) + fossil: Tertiary to Recent (Sepkoski 2002) [details]
Taxonomic remark Vachard et al., 2015 include Nodophthalmidium in the family Tubiphytidae (Microproblematica) with the comment "Poorly transformed chambered tubes of Tubiphytes are called Cordiformis Güvenç¸ 1965 (nomen nudum; see Vachard and Montenat, 1981 and Vachard and Ferrière, 1991) and Nodophthalmidium Macfadyen, 1939", however at this time the treatment of this genus as a foraminifer per WoRMS and other sources appear more usual (possibly Vachard et al.'s listing should say "pro parte" or similar). [details]
| |