| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsErgilornithidae Kozlova, 1960 †
102353 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:102353)
unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Family
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark From Musser et al., 2019: Traditionally, the morphologically similar Eogruidae and Ergilornithidae were divided into...
Taxonomic remark From Musser et al., 2019: Traditionally, the morphologically similar Eogruidae and Ergilornithidae were divided into separate families; however, traditional Eogruidae is likely paraphyletic with respect to Ergilornithidae (Clarke et al. 2005). Here, we use the suggested terminology of Clarke et al. (2005), and consider Eogruidae to include taxa that were historically placed within Ergilornithidae. [details]
IRMNG (2024). Ergilornithidae Kozlova, 1960 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=102353 on 2024-11-21
Date action by
basis of record
Benton, M.J. (ed). (1993). The Fossil Record 2. Chapman & Hall, London, 845 pp. [details]
source of synonymy Musser, G.; Li, Z.; Clarke, J. A. (2019). A new species of Eogruidae (Aves: Gruiformes) from the Miocene of the Linxia Basin, Gansu, China: evolutionary and climatic implications. <em>The Auk.</em> 137(1): 1-13., available online at https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/ukz067 [details] extant flag source Benton, M.J. (ed). (1993). The Fossil Record 2. Chapman & Hall, London, 845 pp. [details] habitat flag source Benton, M.J. (ed). (1993). The Fossil Record 2. Chapman & Hall, London, 845 pp. [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Benton, 1993 habitat flag(s): T; stratigraphic range: Oligocene (Rupelian)-Pliocene [details]Taxonomic remark From Musser et al., 2019: Traditionally, the morphologically similar Eogruidae and Ergilornithidae were divided into separate families; however, traditional Eogruidae is likely paraphyletic with respect to Ergilornithidae (Clarke et al. 2005). Here, we use the suggested terminology of Clarke et al. (2005), and consider Eogruidae to include taxa that were historically placed within Ergilornithidae. [details] |
