IRMNG taxon details
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
additional source
Doweld, A. B. (2018). (2591) Proposal to conserve the name Lyginopteris against Dictyoxylon (fossil Spermatophyta: Lyginopteridopsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 67(1): 219-220., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/671.29 note: recommends conserving Lyginopteris, hence also higher taxon names based upon it [details]
status source
Herendeen, P. S. (2020). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 13. <em>Taxon.</em> 69(2): 398-402., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12218 note: accepts Lyginopteris as nom. coms. [details]
taxonomy source
Novikoff, A.; Barabasz-Krasny, B. (2015). System of Embryophytes. In: Novikoff A., Barabasz-Krasny B. Modern Plant Systematics: 23-63. Liga-Pres, Lviv, Ukraine. , available online at https://phytomorphology.org/personal-information/system-of-embryophytes/ [details]
name verified source
Anderson, J. M.; Anderson, H. M.; Cleal, C. J. (2007). Brief history of the gymnosperms: classification, biodiversity, phytogeography and ecology. Strelitzia 20. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, 280 pp. , available online at https://www.sanbi.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2007_Strelitzia20.pdf [details]
current name source
Novikoff, A.; Barabasz-Krasny, B. (2015). System of Embryophytes. In: Novikoff A., Barabasz-Krasny B. Modern Plant Systematics: 23-63. Liga-Pres, Lviv, Ukraine. , available online at https://phytomorphology.org/personal-information/system-of-embryophytes/ note: authorship given as Bessey [details]
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Authorship also given elsewhere as Bessey, 1907, Zalessky, 1906, and Potonié, 1902, however Potonié, 1900 is correct according to Anderson et al., 2007. [details]
| |