| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsUmbellaceae Pojarkov, 1965 †
105751 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:105751)
unaccepted (nomen rejiciendum)
Family
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark The type genus Umbella V.P. Maslov non C. d’Orb. was originally described as a foraminifer and is a junior homonym under...
Taxonomic remark The type genus Umbella V.P. Maslov non C. d’Orb. was originally described as a foraminifer and is a junior homonym under the ICZN, but later considered a charophyte for which Umbella would be the correct name (not preoccupied in botany). Loeblich & Tappan (1961) proposed the replacement name Umbellina in zoology only; in botany this would be a superfluous replacement name. Doweld (2014) proposed changing the botanical name to Umbellinaceae to make the treatment equivalent under both Codes, which was recommended for acceptance by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils in 2016, refer Herendeen, 2016. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Umbellaceae Pojarkov, 1965 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=105751 on 2024-10-21
Date action by
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
additional source Doweld, A. B. (2014). (2285–2286) Proposals to conserve the names <I>Umbellina</I> against <I>Umbella</I> and <I>Umbellinaceae</I> against <I>Umbellaceae</I> (fossil <I>Charophyta</I>). <em>Taxon.</em> 63(2): 441-442., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/632.38 note: as nom. rej. prop. [details] source of synonymy Herendeen, P. S. (2016). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 10. <em>Taxon.</em> 65(2): 382-387., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/652.18 note: nom. rej. (recommended for rejection vs. Umbellinaceae Tappan) [details] extant flag source as per included genera [details] Unreviewed
Classification Eukaryota (Superkingdom) > Plantae (Kingdom) > Thallobionta (Subkingdom) > Chlorophyta (Phylum) > Charophyceae (Class) > Charophyceae (awaiting allocation) (Order) > Umbellaceae (Family) [details]Taxonomic remark The type genus Umbella V.P. Maslov non C. d’Orb. was originally described as a foraminifer and is a junior homonym under the ICZN, but later considered a charophyte for which Umbella would be the correct name (not preoccupied in botany). Loeblich & Tappan (1961) proposed the replacement name Umbellina in zoology only; in botany this would be a superfluous replacement name. Doweld (2014) proposed changing the botanical name to Umbellinaceae to make the treatment equivalent under both Codes, which was recommended for acceptance by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils in 2016, refer Herendeen, 2016. [details] |
