| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsSphenophyllites A.T. Brongniart, 1822 †
1076032 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1076032)
unaccepted > unavailable name (nomen rejiciendum)
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Nom. rej. Also as Sphoenophyllites (original variant spelling). A homotypic synonym of Sphenophyllum A.T. Brongniart 1828...
Taxonomic remark Nom. rej. Also as Sphoenophyllites (original variant spelling). A homotypic synonym of Sphenophyllum A.T. Brongniart 1828 (nom. cons.) according to Index Nominum Genericorum. From Cleal & Thomas, 2018: The changes in name of this fossil-genus were summarised by Vogellehner (1967), who proposed the conservation of Sphenophyllum Brongniart, 1828 over the earlier names, and this has been adopted since the Seattle ICBN (Stafleu et al. 1972). There was an earlier use of the generic epithet Sphenophyllum, by König (1825) and this is sometimes quoted for the combination Sphenophyllum emarginatum (e.g. Andrews 1955). However, the combination is simply given by König in a plate caption, without accompanying text or even direct reference to Brongniart or his 1822a paper, so is widely regarded as being not validly published. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Sphenophyllites A.T. Brongniart, 1822 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1076032 on 2025-01-30
Date action by
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
source of synonymy Cleal, C. J.; Thomas, B. A. (2018). Nomenclatural status of the palaeobotanical "artificial taxa" established in Brongniart's 1822 “Classification” paper. <em>Fossil Imprint.</em> 74(1-2): 9-28., available online at https://doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0001 [details] status source Cleal, C. J.; Thomas, B. A. (2018). Nomenclatural status of the palaeobotanical "artificial taxa" established in Brongniart's 1822 “Classification” paper. <em>Fossil Imprint.</em> 74(1-2): 9-28., available online at https://doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0001 [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] extant flag source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Foliage; Carboniferous; Europe. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Nomenclatural status nomen rejiciendum [details] Taxonomic remark Nom. rej. Also as Sphoenophyllites (original variant spelling). A homotypic synonym of Sphenophyllum A.T. Brongniart 1828 (nom. cons.) according to Index Nominum Genericorum. From Cleal & Thomas, 2018: The changes in name of this fossil-genus were summarised by Vogellehner (1967), who proposed the conservation of Sphenophyllum Brongniart, 1828 over the earlier names, and this has been adopted since the Seattle ICBN (Stafleu et al. 1972). There was an earlier use of the generic epithet Sphenophyllum, by König (1825) and this is sometimes quoted for the combination Sphenophyllum emarginatum (e.g. Andrews 1955). However, the combination is simply given by König in a plate caption, without accompanying text or even direct reference to Brongniart or his 1822a paper, so is widely regarded as being not validly published. [details] |
