| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsReticulatasporites A.C. Ibrahim, 1933 †
1080657 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1080657)
unaccepted > unavailable name (nomen rejiciendum)
Genus
Reticulatasporonites P. Corsin et al., 1962 † · unaccepted (not validly published; also...)
not validly published; also superfluous replacement name
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Normalised from Reticulata-sporites. Proposed by Doweld, 2018 as a rejected name vs. Vestispora L.R. Wilson & W.S....
Taxonomic remark Normalised from Reticulata-sporites. Proposed by Doweld, 2018 as a rejected name vs. Vestispora L.R. Wilson & W.S. Hoffmeister, 1956, although listed as an accepted genus in Saxena et al., 2021, Doweld's proposal was recommended for acceptance by the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils (Herendeen, 2020). Not Reticulatisporites (original spelling: Reticulati-sporites) Ibrahim, 1933, a different taxon. Genus contains both pteritophyte and fungal spores. From Saxena et al., 2021: the type species, R. facetus Ibrahim 1933, is a fossil pteridophytic spore and the other two fungal spore species [R. argentinus and R. cacheutensis] have been transferred to Inapertisporites Hammen 1954. From Herendeen, 2020: The genus Reticulatasporites Ibrahim was created in 1933 for fossil alete, reticulate microspores. However, it was subsequently demonstrated that these anomalous microfossil spore-like remnants are merely detached operculate processes of corroded spores, the normal form of which was described in 1956 as the genus Vestispora L.R. Wilson & W.S. Hoffmeister. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Reticulatasporites A.C. Ibrahim, 1933 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1080657 on 2024-12-17
Date action by
additional source
Saxena, R. K.; Wijayawardene, N. N.; Dai, D. Q.; Hyde, K. D.; Kirk, P. M. (2021). Diversity in fossil fungal spores. <em>Mycosphere.</em> 12(1): 670-874., available online at https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/8
note: as current name [details] additional source Doweld, A. B. (2018). (2589) Proposal to conserve the name Vestispora against Reticulatasporites (fossil plants). <em>Taxon.</em> 67(1): 216-217., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/671.27 note: as nom. rej. prop. [details] status source Herendeen, P. S. (2020). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 13. <em>Taxon.</em> 69(2): 398-402., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12218 [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Carboniferous. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark Normalised from Reticulata-sporites. Proposed by Doweld, 2018 as a rejected name vs. Vestispora L.R. Wilson & W.S. Hoffmeister, 1956, although listed as an accepted genus in Saxena et al., 2021, Doweld's proposal was recommended for acceptance by the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils (Herendeen, 2020). Not Reticulatisporites (original spelling: Reticulati-sporites) Ibrahim, 1933, a different taxon. Genus contains both pteritophyte and fungal spores. From Saxena et al., 2021: the type species, R. facetus Ibrahim 1933, is a fossil pteridophytic spore and the other two fungal spore species [R. argentinus and R. cacheutensis] have been transferred to Inapertisporites Hammen 1954. From Herendeen, 2020: The genus Reticulatasporites Ibrahim was created in 1933 for fossil alete, reticulate microspores. However, it was subsequently demonstrated that these anomalous microfossil spore-like remnants are merely detached operculate processes of corroded spores, the normal form of which was described in 1956 as the genus Vestispora L.R. Wilson & W.S. Hoffmeister. [details] |
