| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsBucklandia A.T. Brongniart, 1828 †
1083037 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1083037)
unaccepted > junior subjective synonym (junior homonym and synonym)
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark A homotypic synonym of Conites Sternberg 1823 according to Index Nominum Genericorum. A nom. cons. prop. vs. Bucklandia...
Taxonomic remark A homotypic synonym of Conites Sternberg 1823 according to Index Nominum Genericorum. A nom. cons. prop. vs. Bucklandia Sternberg, 1823 and Conites Sternberg, refer Doweld, 2012, however this proposal was rejected by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils (Herendeen, 2016), although in the Summary of that paper the name was erroneously listed among the "15 generic names [which] are recommended for conservation". [details]
IRMNG (2022). Bucklandia A.T. Brongniart, 1828 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1083037 on 2024-10-08
Date action by
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
additional source Novikoff, A.; Barabasz-Krasny, B. (2015). System of Embryophytes. In: Novikoff A., Barabasz-Krasny B. Modern Plant Systematics: 23-63. Liga-Pres, Lviv, Ukraine. , available online at https://phytomorphology.org/personal-information/system-of-embryophytes/ note: as current name, however see Herendeen, 2016, who treats this name as a junior synonym of Conites [details] additional source Doweld, A. B. (2012). (2099) Proposal to conserve the name Bucklandia Brongn. against Bucklandia Sternb. and Conites (fossil Gymnospermae, Cycadeoideopsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 61: 1131-1132., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615033 note: as nom. cons. prop., however see Herendeen, 2016 [details] source of synonymy Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] status source Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] verified source for family Novikoff, A.; Barabasz-Krasny, B. (2015). System of Embryophytes. In: Novikoff A., Barabasz-Krasny B. Modern Plant Systematics: 23-63. Liga-Pres, Lviv, Ukraine. , available online at https://phytomorphology.org/personal-information/system-of-embryophytes/ [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] extant flag source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unverified
Descriptive info Stem; Jurassic; Stonesfield, Oxfordshire, England. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark A homotypic synonym of Conites Sternberg 1823 according to Index Nominum Genericorum. A nom. cons. prop. vs. Bucklandia Sternberg, 1823 and Conites Sternberg, refer Doweld, 2012, however this proposal was rejected by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils (Herendeen, 2016), although in the Summary of that paper the name was erroneously listed among the "15 generic names [which] are recommended for conservation". [details] |
