| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsAnaptomorphidae Cope, 1883 †
108827 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:108827)
unaccepted (currently accepted as subfamily, however refer note)
Family
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Treated as family in Benton, 1992, however most workers presently treat as a subfamily of Omomydae; would be the next...
Taxonomic remark Treated as family in Benton, 1992, however most workers presently treat as a subfamily of Omomydae; would be the next available name for most genera in the family if Omomys were transferred to Tarsiidae, as suggested in Rosenberger, 2011. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Anaptomorphidae Cope, 1883 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=108827 on 2025-01-21
Date action by
basis of record
PalaeoDB (June 2008) [details]
additional source Rosenberger, A. L. (2011). The face of Strigorhysis: implications of another tarsier-like, large-eyed Eocene North American tarsiiform primate. <em>The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology.</em> 294(5): 797-812., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.21367 note: mentions possible transfer of Omomys to Tarsiidae, in which case remaining genera would be allocated to Anaptomorphidae (raised from Anaptomorphinae) [details] source of synonymy Morse, P. E.; Chester, S. G.; Boyer, D. M.; Smith, T.; Smith, R.; Gigase, P.; Bloch, J. I. (2019). New fossils, systematics, and biogeography of the oldest known crown primate Teilhardina from the earliest Eocene of Asia, Europe, and North America. <em>Journal of Human Evolution.</em> 128: 103-131., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2018.08.005 note: inferred (treats Omomyidae as accepted family) [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info All genera fossil (SN2000). Benton, 1993 habitat flag(s): T; stratigraphic range: Palaeocene (Danian)-Eocene (Priabonian) [details]Taxonomic remark Treated as family in Benton, 1992, however most workers presently treat as a subfamily of Omomydae; would be the next available name for most genera in the family if Omomys were transferred to Tarsiidae, as suggested in Rosenberger, 2011. [details] |
