| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsUmbellina Loeblich & Tappan, 1961 †
Umbella V.P. Maslov in E.V. Bykova, 1955 † · unaccepted (nomen rejiciendum in botany,...)
nomen rejiciendum in botany, junior homonym in zoology (where first proposed)
fossil only
J. Paleont. 35
page(s): 284 [details]
Taxonomic remark Originally considered a foraminifer (zoology), currently a fossil charophyte (botany). Substitute name for purposes of...
Taxonomic remark Originally considered a foraminifer (zoology), currently a fossil charophyte (botany). Substitute name for purposes of zoological homonymy. (Index Nominum Genericorum). n.n. pro Umbella Maslov 1955 (Nomen. Zool.). A homotypic synonym of Umbella V.P. Maslov 1955 according to Index Nominum Genericorum. In botany, a superfluous substitute name, however proposed to be conserved over Umbella Maslov for consistency between Codes by Doweld, 2014; this proposal subsequently accepted by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils, refer Herendeen, 2016. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Umbellina Loeblich & Tappan, 1961 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1090210 on 2024-11-23
Date action by 2016-11-22 08:30:58Z changed db_admin
original description
J. Paleont. 35
page(s): 284 [details] basis of record Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details] additional source Doweld, A. B. (2014). (2285–2286) Proposals to conserve the names <I>Umbellina</I> against <I>Umbella</I> and <I>Umbellinaceae</I> against <I>Umbellaceae</I> (fossil <I>Charophyta</I>). <em>Taxon.</em> 63(2): 441-442., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/632.38 note: nom. cons. prop. [details] status source Herendeen, P. S. (2016). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 10. <em>Taxon.</em> 65(2): 382-387., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/652.18 [details] verified source for family Herendeen, P. S. (2016). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 10. <em>Taxon.</em> 65(2): 382-387., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/652.18 [details] current name source Herendeen, P. S. (2016). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 10. <em>Taxon.</em> 65(2): 382-387., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/652.18 note: as nom. cons. prop. (recommended) [details] habitat flag source WoRMS (Mar 2013) [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Originally considered a foraminifer (zoology), currently a fossil charophyte (botany). Substitute name for purposes of zoological homonymy. (Index Nominum Genericorum). n.n. pro Umbella Maslov 1955 (Nomen. Zool.). A homotypic synonym of Umbella V.P. Maslov 1955 according to Index Nominum Genericorum. In botany, a superfluous substitute name, however proposed to be conserved over Umbella Maslov for consistency between Codes by Doweld, 2014; this proposal subsequently accepted by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils, refer Herendeen, 2016. [details]
|
