IRMNG taxon details
additional source
Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhang, W.; Zheng, S; Tian, N. (2009). Biodiversity and palaeoclimatic implications of fossil wood from the non-marine Jurassic of China. <em>Episodes.</em> 32: 13-20., available online at http://52.172.159.94/index.php/epi/article/view/63970 [details]
additional source
Zheng, S.-L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.-D.; Yang, X.-J.; Li, N.; Fu, X. P. (2005). Jurassic fossil wood of Sahnioxylon from western Liaoning, China and special references to its systematic affinity. <em>Global Geology.</em> 24: 209-216. [details]
additional source
Philippe, M.; Bamford, M. K. (2008). A key to morphogenera used for Mesozoic conifer-like woods. <em>Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology.</em> 148(2-4): 184-207., available online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2007.09.004 [details]
current name source
Philippe, M.; Cuny, G.; Bashforth, A. (2010). Ecpagloxylon mathiesenii gen. nov. et sp. nov., a Jurassic wood from Greenland with several primitive angiosperm features. <em>Plant Systematics and Evolution.</em> 287(3-4): 153-165., available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-010-0308-z [details]
habitat flag source
as per family [details]
original description
(of Homoxylon B. Sahni, 1932 †) Memoirs of the Geological Survey of India: Palaeontologia Indica 20: -. [1-19] [details]
Unreviewed
Descriptive info Wood; Jurassic; Rajmahal Hills, Bihar, India. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]
Taxonomic remark Substitute name for Homoxylon B. Sahni 1932, non T. Hartig 1848. (Index Nominum Genericorum). Initially suggested to be wood of a vessel-less angiosperm, subsequently assigned to Bennetitales (gymnosperms). However Wang et al., 2009, quoting Zheng et al., 2005 (Global Geology 24: 209-216) claim that Sahnioxylon "mostly represents an evolutionary transition link between the Paleozoic wood Guizhouoxylon and the Late Triassic genus Paradoxoxylon, and is an an ancestral plant type of angiosperms without vessels". From Philippe & Bamford, 2008: Sahnioxylon Bose et Sah ... is validly published despite that no type is designated in protologue as this name was published before 1958 (ICBN, art. 37.1), as a matter of fact in 1955 (and not 1954 as usually indicated). [details]
| |