IRMNG name details
source of synonymy
Doweld, A. B. (2002). (1549–1550) Proposals to conserve the names Angarocarpus and Tungussocarpus (fossil plants), the former with a conserved type. <em>Taxon.</em> 51(3): 581-582., available online at https://doi.org/10.2307/1554885 note: refer note [details]
status source
Herendeen, P. S. (2011). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossil Plants: 7. <em>Taxon.</em> 60(3): 902-905., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.603027 [details]
verified source for family
Doweld, A. B. (2002). (1549–1550) Proposals to conserve the names Angarocarpus and Tungussocarpus (fossil plants), the former with a conserved type. <em>Taxon.</em> 51(3): 581-582., available online at https://doi.org/10.2307/1554885 note: inferred (as per Samaropsis, original genus placement of cited included species) [details]
Unreviewed
Descriptive info Seed; Upper Permian; Sokolova, Tyhta River, Kuznetsk Basin, Siberia, Russia. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]
Taxonomic remark According to Doweld, 2002, Russian paleobotanists today use Angarocarpus in a sense differently from that originally published, while the type of Tungussocarpus lies within Angarocarpus, making the two names synonyms. Doweld proposed to separate the genera per current usage by selecting a different type for Angarocarpus, but this proposal did not receive support from the Nomenclature Committee for Fossil Plants (Herendeen, 2011). [details]
|