Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG taxon details

Attritasporites Combaz, 1967 †

1091903  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1091903)

accepted
Genus

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Described as spore of fossil land plant (and treated as Sporae dispersae by subsequent authors), however reassigned to...  
Taxonomic remark Described as spore of fossil land plant (and treated as Sporae dispersae by subsequent authors), however reassigned to Acritarcha by Navidi-Izad et al., 2022 (no evidence for land plant origin). These aithors state: The biological affinity of these taxa [i.e., Virgatasporites and Attritasporites] remains uncertain. They are clearly spore-like microfossils, and in younger sediments they would have been identified and classified as cryptospores. However, there is so far no evidence for a biological affinity and a relationship to the embryophyte lineage. Therefore, both taxa must be classified as incertae sedis, i.e. as acritarchs, that are defined as organic-walled microfossils of unknown biological affinity. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Attritasporites Combaz, 1967 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1091903 on 2025-03-30
Date
action
by
2007-06-11 22:00:00Z
created
2011-12-31 23:00:00Z
changed
2021-11-22 09:04:22Z
changed

basis of record Mullins, G. L. (editor). (2007). The phytoPal Taxonomic Database (taxon list). Collated and edited by G. L. Mullins, with contributions from R. J. Aldridge, K. J. Dorning, A. Le Herisse, Li Jun, M. Moczydlowska-Vidal, S. G. Molyneux, T. Servais and R. Wicander, version 02 February 2007. Pages 1-1132. Originally downloaded from http://www.le.ac.uk/geology/glm2/phytopal/taxa.pdf. [details] 

current name source Mullins, G. L. (editor). (2007). The phytoPal Taxonomic Database (taxon list). Collated and edited by G. L. Mullins, with contributions from R. J. Aldridge, K. J. Dorning, A. Le Herisse, Li Jun, M. Moczydlowska-Vidal, S. G. Molyneux, T. Servais and R. Wicander, version 02 February 2007. Pages 1-1132. Originally downloaded from http://www.le.ac.uk/geology/glm2/phytopal/taxa.pdf. [details] 

extant flag source Mullins, G. L. (editor). (2007). The phytoPal Taxonomic Database (taxon list). Collated and edited by G. L. Mullins, with contributions from R. J. Aldridge, K. J. Dorning, A. Le Herisse, Li Jun, M. Moczydlowska-Vidal, S. G. Molyneux, T. Servais and R. Wicander, version 02 February 2007. Pages 1-1132. Originally downloaded from http://www.le.ac.uk/geology/glm2/phytopal/taxa.pdf. [details] 

habitat flag source Mullins, G. L. (editor). (2007). The phytoPal Taxonomic Database (taxon list). Collated and edited by G. L. Mullins, with contributions from R. J. Aldridge, K. J. Dorning, A. Le Herisse, Li Jun, M. Moczydlowska-Vidal, S. G. Molyneux, T. Servais and R. Wicander, version 02 February 2007. Pages 1-1132. Originally downloaded from http://www.le.ac.uk/geology/glm2/phytopal/taxa.pdf. [details] 
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Described as spore of fossil land plant (and treated as Sporae dispersae by subsequent authors), however reassigned to Acritarcha by Navidi-Izad et al., 2022 (no evidence for land plant origin). These aithors state: The biological affinity of these taxa [i.e., Virgatasporites and Attritasporites] remains uncertain. They are clearly spore-like microfossils, and in younger sediments they would have been identified and classified as cryptospores. However, there is so far no evidence for a biological affinity and a relationship to the embryophyte lineage. Therefore, both taxa must be classified as incertae sedis, i.e. as acritarchs, that are defined as organic-walled microfossils of unknown biological affinity. [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»