| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsMenais Loefling, 1758
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark According to GRIN, a rejected name under Vienna ICBN Art. 56 (see App. V), although this name does not appear therein....
Taxonomic remark According to GRIN, a rejected name under Vienna ICBN Art. 56 (see App. V), although this name does not appear therein. Proposed for rejection by Dorr & Wiersema, 2010 as of doubtful identity, but listed as an accepted genus in Plants of the World Online (2017 version). [details]
IRMNG (2021). Menais Loefling, 1758. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1100574 on 2024-11-22
Date action by
additional source
Dorr, L.J.; Wiersema, J.H. (2010). (1947–1958) Proposals to reject twelve names emanating from Loefling’s Iter Hispanicum (1758), Ayenia sidiformis (Malvaceae), Cofer (Symplocaceae), Cruzeta and C. hispanica (Amaranthaceae), Edechia inermis and E. spinosa (Rubiaceae), Justicia putata (Acanthaceae), Menais and M. topiaria (?Boraginaceae), Muco (Capparaceae), Samyda parviflora Salicaceae), and Spermacoce suffruticosa (Rubiaceae). <em>Taxon.</em> 59: 1280-1282. [details]
verified source for family GRIN Taxonomy for Plants: U.S. National Plant Germplasm Resources Information Network, September 2011 version. Available online at https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomyquery.aspx. [details] current name source Plants of the World Online (2017 version). , available online at http://powo.science.kew.org [details] extant flag source GRIN Taxonomy for Plants: U.S. National Plant Germplasm Resources Information Network, September 2011 version. Available online at https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomyquery.aspx. [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark According to GRIN, a rejected name under Vienna ICBN Art. 56 (see App. V), although this name does not appear therein. Proposed for rejection by Dorr & Wiersema, 2010 as of doubtful identity, but listed as an accepted genus in Plants of the World Online (2017 version). [details]
|
