| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsPolypodiisporonites R. Potonié, 1931 †
1101180 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1101180)
unaccepted (nomen rejiciendum)
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Normalised from Polypodii-sporonites. Nom. rej. (recommended) vs. Polypodiisporites R. Potonié, 1933, refer Herendeen,...
Taxonomic remark Normalised from Polypodii-sporonites. Nom. rej. (recommended) vs. Polypodiisporites R. Potonié, 1933, refer Herendeen, 2016: Potonié revised his system of naming spores and pollen in 1933, changing e.g. Polypodii-sporonites to Polypodii-sporites (more recently treated without hyphens), however such replacement names were illegitimate until proposed for conservation by later workers. Saxena & Trivedi, 2006 include this as an accepted name in addition to Polypodiisporites, which is an inconsistency; following Herendeen, 2016, only Polypodiisporites should be used for this taxon. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Polypodiisporonites R. Potonié, 1931 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1101180 on 2024-11-21
Date action by
additional source
Doweld, A. B. (2014). (2272) Proposal to conserve the name Polypodiisporites with that spelling against Polypodii-sporonites (fossil plants). <em>Taxon.</em> 63(1): 202-203., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/631.31
note: as nom. rej. prop. [details] source of synonymy Herendeen, P. S. (2016). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 10. <em>Taxon.</em> 65(2): 382-387., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/652.18 [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Normalised from Polypodii-sporonites. Nom. rej. (recommended) vs. Polypodiisporites R. Potonié, 1933, refer Herendeen, 2016: Potonié revised his system of naming spores and pollen in 1933, changing e.g. Polypodii-sporonites to Polypodii-sporites (more recently treated without hyphens), however such replacement names were illegitimate until proposed for conservation by later workers. Saxena & Trivedi, 2006 include this as an accepted name in addition to Polypodiisporites, which is an inconsistency; following Herendeen, 2016, only Polypodiisporites should be used for this taxon. [details]
|
