IRMNG taxon details
basis of record
CoL2006/AlgaeBase [details]
basis of record
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
verified source for family
Williams, G. L.; Fensome, R. A.; MacRae, R. A. (2017). DINOFLAJ3. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists, Data Series no. 2. , available online at http://dinoflaj.smu.ca/dinoflaj3 [details]
name verified source
Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details]
current name source
CoL 2006 [details]
current name source
WoRMS (Mar 2013) [details]
extant flag source
Fensome, R.A., Taylor, F.J.R., Norris, G., Sarjeant, W.A.S., Wharton, D.I. & Williams, G.L. (1993). A Classification of Living and Fossil Dinoflagellates. Micropaleontology Special Publication 7, 350pp. [details]
habitat flag source
Fensome, R.A., Taylor, F.J.R., Norris, G., Sarjeant, W.A.S., Wharton, D.I. & Williams, G.L. (1993). A Classification of Living and Fossil Dinoflagellates. Micropaleontology Special Publication 7, 350pp. [details]
Unreviewed
Descriptive info Cretaceous; Bassin de Paris, France. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]
Taxonomic remark From DINOFLAJ3: Taxonomic junior synonym: Cladopyxidium, by implication in Marheinecke (1992, p.105), who transferred the "type species", Palaeostomocystis reticulata, to Cladopyxidium — however, Lentin and Williams (1993, p.483) retained Cladopyxidium. This name was not validly published in Deflandre (1935, p.234) since no type was designated. According to Stover and Evitt (1978, p.6), Deflandre (1966, p.6) emended the diagnosis of this genus; however, no formal emendation was proposed in Deflandre (1966). [details]
| |