IRMNG taxon details
additional source
Doweld, A. B. (2013). (2191) Proposal to conserve the name Crowella against Actinostrobites and Frenelites (fossil Lauraceae). <em>Taxon.</em> 62(4): 844-844., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/624.28 note: as nom. rej. prop., however see Herendeen, 2015 [details]
status source
Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details]
verified source for family
Doweld, A. B. (2013). (2191) Proposal to conserve the name Crowella against Actinostrobites and Frenelites (fossil Lauraceae). <em>Taxon.</em> 62(4): 844-844., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/624.28 [details]
current name source
Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details]
habitat flag source
as per family [details]
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Originally interpreted as the cone of a fossil conifer; later as an angiosperm fruit (same as Crowella globosa (Bowerb.) E. Reid & M. Chandler, 1933). Doweld, 2013 proposed to conserve the genus name Crowella over Actinostrobites but this proposal was rejected by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils (Herendeen, 2015). [details]
|