| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsSubsigillaria M. Mercenier, 1913 †
1114456 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1114456)
unaccepted (re-use of subgenus name, not validly published?)
Genus
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Authorship as given in Index Nominum Genericorum, however Herendeen, 2015 considers this name (also Eusigillaria) as...
Taxonomic remark Authorship as given in Index Nominum Genericorum, however Herendeen, 2015 considers this name (also Eusigillaria) as subgenera of Sigillaria introduced by Weiss (year not stated) and re-used in this sense by Mercenier: "even if we accept that Mercenier was raising these subgenera in rank to genera (and it is far from clear that he was)...". Doweld's (2012) proposal to reject this name in favour of Cyclodendron (based on a synonym assertion by Jongmans, 1936) was therefore deemed unnecessary. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Subsigillaria M. Mercenier, 1913 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1114456 on 2024-11-26
Date action by
additional source
Doweld, A. B. (2012). (2092) Proposal to conserve the name Cyclodendron against Subsigillaria and Eusigillaria (fossil Lycopodiophyta: Lepidodendropsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 61(5): 1125-1126., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615028
note: as nom. rej. prop., however see Herendeen, 2015 [details] source of synonymy Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 note: refer note [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Stem fragment; Permian; Lukuga, Tanzania. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark Authorship as given in Index Nominum Genericorum, however Herendeen, 2015 considers this name (also Eusigillaria) as subgenera of Sigillaria introduced by Weiss (year not stated) and re-used in this sense by Mercenier: "even if we accept that Mercenier was raising these subgenera in rank to genera (and it is far from clear that he was)...". Doweld's (2012) proposal to reject this name in favour of Cyclodendron (based on a synonym assertion by Jongmans, 1936) was therefore deemed unnecessary. [details] |
