IRMNG taxon details
original description
Gen. Pl.: 51. 4 Aug 1789. [details]
basis of record
Brands, S. J. (compiler). (1989-2005). Systema Naturae 2000. Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2006 version). Originally available online at http://sn2000.taxonomy.nl/; for current information, refer http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/ProjectDescription.aspx . [details]
basis of record
Reveal, J. L. (2006). USDA - APHIS - Concordance of Family Names, 2006 version. Available online at http://www.plantsystematics.org/reveal/pbio/usda/usdaindex.html. [details]
status source
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. (2016). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. <em>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.</em> 181(1): 1-20., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385 [details]
current name source
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. (2016). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. <em>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.</em> 181(1): 1-20., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12385 [details]
extant flag source
Systema Naturae 2000 (2006 version) [details]
original description
(of Phormiaceae J.G. Agardh, 1858) Theoria Syst. Pl.: 7. Apr-Sep 1858. [details]
original description
(of Aloaceae Batsch, 1802) Tab. Affin. Regni Veg.: 138. 2 Mai 1802. [details]
original description
(of Dianellaceae Salisbury, 1866) Gen. Pl.: 66. 15-31 Mai 1866. [details]
original description
(of Hemerocallidaceae R. Brown, 1810) Prodr.: 295. 27 Mar 1810. [details]
original description
(of Xanthorrhoeaceae Dumortier, 1829) Anal. Fam. Pl.: 60, 62, 103. page(s): 1829 [details]
Unreviewed
Classification Eukaryota (Superkingdom) > Plantae (Kingdom) > Magnoliophyta (Phylum) > Liliopsida (Class) > Liliidae (Subclass) > Asparagales (Order) > Asphodelaceae (Family) [details]
Descriptive info Angiosperms, nonmarine except where noted [details]
Nomenclatural status nomen conservandum propositum [details]
Taxonomic remark This family (Asphodelaceae sensu lato, including Xanthorrhoeaceae) was named Xanthorrhoeaceae in APG III because the latter is a nom. cons., however a proposal has been submitted to restore the priority of Asphodelaceae (which is the earlier published name and is also in general use for most of the included genera) which is anticipated to be approved in 2017, refer APG IV (2016). [details]
| |