| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsCochleare Gosse in Hudson & Gosse, 1886
1165997 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1165997)
unaccepted (listed as unaccepted in Jersabek et al., 2018)
Genus
recent only
in Hudson & Gosse, Rotifera, 2
page(s): 111 [details]
Taxonomic remark From Jersabek et al., 2018: the two described species are evidently male rotifers that cannot be allocated to any nominal...
Taxonomic remark From Jersabek et al., 2018: the two described species are evidently male rotifers that cannot be allocated to any nominal genus. Unavailable name: not included in Rotifera List of Accepted Names (LAN) for genera. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Cochleare Gosse in Hudson & Gosse, 1886. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1165997 on 2024-11-12
Date action by
original description
in Hudson & Gosse, Rotifera, 2
page(s): 111 [details] basis of record Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details] status source Jersabek, C. D.; De Smet, W. H.; Hinz, C.; Fontaneto, D.; Hussey, C. G.; Michaloudi, E.; Wallace, R. L.; Segers, H. (2018). List of Available Names in Zoology, Candidate Part Phylum Rotifera, genus-group names established before 1 January 2000. , available online at https://archive.org/details/LANCandidatePartGeneraRotifera [details] name verified source Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark From Jersabek et al., 2018: the two described species are evidently male rotifers that cannot be allocated to any nominal genus. Unavailable name: not included in Rotifera List of Accepted Names (LAN) for genera. [details]
|
