| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsPrasinema G.J. Retallack, 2011 †
fossil only
Retallack, G. J. (2011). Problematic megafossils in Cambrian palaeosols of South Australia. <em>Palaeontology.</em> 54(6): 1223-1242., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01099.x [details]
Taxonomic remark Described as putative Cambrian fungus (lichen) in original work; suggested to be a pseudofossil by Jago et al., 2012,...
Taxonomic remark Described as putative Cambrian fungus (lichen) in original work; suggested to be a pseudofossil by Jago et al., 2012, counter-argued by Retallack, 2012, Palaeontology, 55: 919–921. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Prasinema G.J. Retallack, 2011 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11902707 on 2024-11-21
Date action by
original description
Retallack, G. J. (2011). Problematic megafossils in Cambrian palaeosols of South Australia. <em>Palaeontology.</em> 54(6): 1223-1242., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01099.x [details]
basis of record Retallack, G. J. (2011). Problematic megafossils in Cambrian palaeosols of South Australia. <em>Palaeontology.</em> 54(6): 1223-1242., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01099.x [details] current name source Retallack, G. J. (2011). Problematic megafossils in Cambrian palaeosols of South Australia. <em>Palaeontology.</em> 54(6): 1223-1242., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01099.x [details] extant flag source Retallack, G. J. (2011). Problematic megafossils in Cambrian palaeosols of South Australia. <em>Palaeontology.</em> 54(6): 1223-1242., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01099.x [details] habitat flag source Retallack, G. J. (2011). Problematic megafossils in Cambrian palaeosols of South Australia. <em>Palaeontology.</em> 54(6): 1223-1242., available online at https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2011.01099.x [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Described as putative Cambrian fungus (lichen) in original work; suggested to be a pseudofossil by Jago et al., 2012, counter-argued by Retallack, 2012, Palaeontology, 55: 919–921. [details]
|
