Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG taxon details

Ruzenia O. Hilber in Hilber & Hilber, 2002

11914349  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11914349)

accepted
Genus
Ruzenia O. Hilber ex A.N. Miller & Huhndorf, 2004 · unaccepted (later usage (isonym))

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

marine, brackish
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark This genus is listed as invalid in Mycobank (Sep 2019), the reason stated elsewhere being incorrect citation of the...  
Taxonomic remark This genus is listed as invalid in Mycobank (Sep 2019), the reason stated elsewhere being incorrect citation of the basionym of its type species, however the latter is a correctable error according to Index Fungorum, which treats the genus as valid (a change of position since the publication of Kirk et al., 2008 "Dictionary of the Fungi"). [details]
IRMNG (2021). Ruzenia O. Hilber in Hilber & Hilber, 2002. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11914349 on 2024-11-28
Date
action
by
2019-08-31 19:01:39Z
created
2019-09-03 19:04:39Z
changed

basis of record Mycobank (2019 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] 

verified source for family Mycobank (2019 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] 

name verified source Index Fungorum (2019 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] 

current name source Index Fungorum (2019 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] 

extant flag source Mycobank (2019 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] 

habitat flag source Mycobank (2019 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] 
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark This genus is listed as invalid in Mycobank (Sep 2019), the reason stated elsewhere being incorrect citation of the basionym of its type species, however the latter is a correctable error according to Index Fungorum, which treats the genus as valid (a change of position since the publication of Kirk et al., 2008 "Dictionary of the Fungi"). [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»