IRMNG taxon details
original description
Molinari-Novoa, E. A.; Mayta, L. F.; Sánchez Ocharan, C. E.; Guiry, M. D. (2021). Nomenclatural notes on algae. I. Replacement names for various algal taxa. <em>Notulae Algarum.</em> 177: 1-9. [details]
basis of record
Molinari-Novoa, E. A.; Mayta, L. F.; Sánchez Ocharan, C. E.; Guiry, M. D. (2021). Nomenclatural notes on algae. I. Replacement names for various algal taxa. <em>Notulae Algarum.</em> 177: 1-9. [details]
verified source for family
Molinari-Novoa, E. A.; Mayta, L. F.; Sánchez Ocharan, C. E.; Guiry, M. D. (2021). Nomenclatural notes on algae. I. Replacement names for various algal taxa. <em>Notulae Algarum.</em> 177: 1-9. [details]
name verified source
Molinari-Novoa, E. A.; Mayta, L. F.; Sánchez Ocharan, C. E.; Guiry, M. D. (2021). Nomenclatural notes on algae. I. Replacement names for various algal taxa. <em>Notulae Algarum.</em> 177: 1-9. [details]
current name source
Molinari-Novoa, E. A.; Mayta, L. F.; Sánchez Ocharan, C. E.; Guiry, M. D. (2021). Nomenclatural notes on algae. I. Replacement names for various algal taxa. <em>Notulae Algarum.</em> 177: 1-9. [details]
extant flag source
Molinari-Novoa, E. A.; Mayta, L. F.; Sánchez Ocharan, C. E.; Guiry, M. D. (2021). Nomenclatural notes on algae. I. Replacement names for various algal taxa. <em>Notulae Algarum.</em> 177: 1-9. [details]
habitat flag source
Molinari-Novoa, E. A.; Mayta, L. F.; Sánchez Ocharan, C. E.; Guiry, M. D. (2021). Nomenclatural notes on algae. I. Replacement names for various algal taxa. <em>Notulae Algarum.</em> 177: 1-9. [details]
original description
(of Cyanospira Florenzano, Sili, Pelosi & Vincenzini, 1985) Arch. Microbiol. 140 page(s): 305 [details]
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Nomen novum for Cyanospira Florenzano, Sili, Pelosi & Vincenzini (in Juráň & al.), 2015, non Cyanospira Chodat, 1921 (Euglenaceae, = Euglenidae in zoology). From Molinari-Novoa et al, 2021: Originally introduced by Florenzano & al. (1985), it was validated in the proposal for its conservation (Juráň & al. 2015), which was not recommended twice (Prud’homme van Reine 2017, Andersen 2018). We use the suggested name for this genus given in the latter report, so it may be valid and available for use under both the ICN and the International Code of Nomenclature for Prokaryotes (ICNP). [details]
| |