| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsEfluegelia Vachard in Massa & Vachard, 1979 †
11918594 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11918594)
unaccepted (synonym and unjustified(?) emendation (of Eflugelia))
Genus
marine,
fossil only
Massa, D.; Vachard, D. (1979). Le Carbonifère de Lybie Occidentale: biostratigraphie et micropaléontologie; position dans le domaine téthysien d'Afrique du Nord. <em>Revue de l'Institut Français du Pétrole.</em> 34(1): 3-65.
note: as Eflugelia (original published spelling) [details]
Taxonomic remark Nom. corr. Mamet, 2006. This name was originally published under the zoological Code as Eflugelia, in honor of Erik...
Taxonomic remark Nom. corr. Mamet, 2006. This name was originally published under the zoological Code as Eflugelia, in honor of Erik Flügel. Mamet, 2006, considering this genus a plant, corrected the spelling to Efluegelia, which may or may not be permissible under the botanical Code (in zoology, the original spelling is to be maintained unless subject to a ruling by the ICZN). Nevertheless Vachard & Cózar, 2010 (although they treat the taxon as zoological) use the corrected spelling, attributing the correction to a work by Krainer et al., 2003, however that work uses the original spelling only (the reference by Vachard & Cózar is presumed to be a mistake). At present, this taxon (under whichever name is correct) is considered to be a taxonomic synonym of Fourstonella, and is treated as a botanical name in IRMNG. [details]
IRMNG (2021). Efluegelia Vachard in Massa & Vachard, 1979 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11918594 on 2024-09-19
Date action by
original description
Massa, D.; Vachard, D. (1979). Le Carbonifère de Lybie Occidentale: biostratigraphie et micropaléontologie; position dans le domaine téthysien d'Afrique du Nord. <em>Revue de l'Institut Français du Pétrole.</em> 34(1): 3-65.
note: as Eflugelia (original published spelling) [details] basis of record Vachard, D.; Cózar, P. (2010). An attempt of classification of the Palaeozoic "incertae sedis" Algospongia. <em>Revista Española de Micropaleontología.</em> 42(2): 129-241. [details] additional source Mamet, B. (2006). Taxonomy of Viséan marine calcareous algae, Fernie, British Columbia (Canada). <em>Rivista Italiana de Stratigrafia e Paleontologia.</em> 112(3): 323-357. note: name corrected (emended) from Eflugelia to Efluegelia (refer note) [details] source of synonymy Vachard, D.; Cózar, P. (2010). An attempt of classification of the Palaeozoic "incertae sedis" Algospongia. <em>Revista Española de Micropaleontología.</em> 42(2): 129-241. [details] verified source for family Vachard, D.; Cózar, P. (2010). An attempt of classification of the Palaeozoic "incertae sedis" Algospongia. <em>Revista Española de Micropaleontología.</em> 42(2): 129-241. note: as Stacheiidae [details] name verified source Vachard, D.; Cózar, P. (2010). An attempt of classification of the Palaeozoic "incertae sedis" Algospongia. <em>Revista Española de Micropaleontología.</em> 42(2): 129-241. [details] extant flag source Vachard, D.; Cózar, P. (2010). An attempt of classification of the Palaeozoic "incertae sedis" Algospongia. <em>Revista Española de Micropaleontología.</em> 42(2): 129-241. [details] habitat flag source Vachard, D.; Cózar, P. (2010). An attempt of classification of the Palaeozoic "incertae sedis" Algospongia. <em>Revista Española de Micropaleontología.</em> 42(2): 129-241. [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark Nom. corr. Mamet, 2006. This name was originally published under the zoological Code as Eflugelia, in honor of Erik Flügel. Mamet, 2006, considering this genus a plant, corrected the spelling to Efluegelia, which may or may not be permissible under the botanical Code (in zoology, the original spelling is to be maintained unless subject to a ruling by the ICZN). Nevertheless Vachard & Cózar, 2010 (although they treat the taxon as zoological) use the corrected spelling, attributing the correction to a work by Krainer et al., 2003, however that work uses the original spelling only (the reference by Vachard & Cózar is presumed to be a mistake). At present, this taxon (under whichever name is correct) is considered to be a taxonomic synonym of Fourstonella, and is treated as a botanical name in IRMNG. [details]
|
