IRMNG taxon details
original description
Wendt, J. (2020). A rare case of an evolutionary late and ephemeral biomineralization: tunicates with composite calcareous skeletons. <em>Journal of Paleontology.</em> 94(4): 748-757., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2019.109 [details]
basis of record
Wendt, J. (2020). A rare case of an evolutionary late and ephemeral biomineralization: tunicates with composite calcareous skeletons. <em>Journal of Paleontology.</em> 94(4): 748-757., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2019.109 [details]
verified source for family
Wendt, J. (2020). A rare case of an evolutionary late and ephemeral biomineralization: tunicates with composite calcareous skeletons. <em>Journal of Paleontology.</em> 94(4): 748-757., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2019.109 note: refer note [details]
name verified source
Wendt, J. (2020). A rare case of an evolutionary late and ephemeral biomineralization: tunicates with composite calcareous skeletons. <em>Journal of Paleontology.</em> 94(4): 748-757., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2019.109 [details]
current name source
Wendt, J. (2020). A rare case of an evolutionary late and ephemeral biomineralization: tunicates with composite calcareous skeletons. <em>Journal of Paleontology.</em> 94(4): 748-757., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2019.109 [details]
extant flag source
Wendt, J. (2020). A rare case of an evolutionary late and ephemeral biomineralization: tunicates with composite calcareous skeletons. <em>Journal of Paleontology.</em> 94(4): 748-757., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2019.109 [details]
habitat flag source
Wendt, J. (2020). A rare case of an evolutionary late and ephemeral biomineralization: tunicates with composite calcareous skeletons. <em>Journal of Paleontology.</em> 94(4): 748-757., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2019.109 [details]
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Genus placed in newly erected family Cassianosomidae by describer (as type genus), however that family name should be formed from the name of the type genus, not the locality (upon which it is based), a point not yet (2023) commented upon in the literature. [details]
|