| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsMystoides Mathur, 1992
11932915 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11932915)
unaccepted > unavailable name (published in thesis)
Lucknowia Gupta, 1961 † accepted as Lytocestus Cohn, 1908
Genus
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark From Scholz et al., 2022: [In this study] the convoluted taxonomy of tapeworms placed in Mystoides Mathur, 1992 is...
Taxonomic remark From Scholz et al., 2022: [In this study] the convoluted taxonomy of tapeworms placed in Mystoides Mathur, 1992 is critically reviewed to clean up taxonomic chaos in Indo-Malayan caryophyllideans. Mystoides was erected in an unpublished PhD thesis and thus its generic name becomes unavailable and also, its type species is conspecific with Lucknowia fossilisi Gupta, 1961 from the stinging catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch). Other species of this genus are also conspecific with L. fossilisi. In addition, specific names of most of these taxa are unavailable because they were described in unpublished theses or conference abstracts. [details]
IRMNG (2023). Mystoides Mathur, 1992. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11932915 on 2024-11-12
Date action by
basis of record
Scholz, T.; Biswas, R.; Patra, B.; Ash, A. (2022). A new genus of caryophyllidean tapeworms (Cestoda) from <i>Mystus</i> catfishes (Bagridae) in India: cleaning up taxonomic chaos. <em>Journal of Helminthology.</em> 96: 1-10., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x22000189 [details]
source of synonymy Scholz, T.; Biswas, R.; Patra, B.; Ash, A. (2022). A new genus of caryophyllidean tapeworms (Cestoda) from <i>Mystus</i> catfishes (Bagridae) in India: cleaning up taxonomic chaos. <em>Journal of Helminthology.</em> 96: 1-10., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x22000189 [details] status source Scholz, T.; Biswas, R.; Patra, B.; Ash, A. (2022). A new genus of caryophyllidean tapeworms (Cestoda) from <i>Mystus</i> catfishes (Bagridae) in India: cleaning up taxonomic chaos. <em>Journal of Helminthology.</em> 96: 1-10., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x22000189 [details] verified source for family Scholz, T.; Biswas, R.; Patra, B.; Ash, A. (2022). A new genus of caryophyllidean tapeworms (Cestoda) from <i>Mystus</i> catfishes (Bagridae) in India: cleaning up taxonomic chaos. <em>Journal of Helminthology.</em> 96: 1-10., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x22000189 [details] name verified source Scholz, T.; Biswas, R.; Patra, B.; Ash, A. (2022). A new genus of caryophyllidean tapeworms (Cestoda) from <i>Mystus</i> catfishes (Bagridae) in India: cleaning up taxonomic chaos. <em>Journal of Helminthology.</em> 96: 1-10., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x22000189 [details] extant flag source Scholz, T.; Biswas, R.; Patra, B.; Ash, A. (2022). A new genus of caryophyllidean tapeworms (Cestoda) from <i>Mystus</i> catfishes (Bagridae) in India: cleaning up taxonomic chaos. <em>Journal of Helminthology.</em> 96: 1-10., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x22000189 [details] habitat flag source Scholz, T.; Biswas, R.; Patra, B.; Ash, A. (2022). A new genus of caryophyllidean tapeworms (Cestoda) from <i>Mystus</i> catfishes (Bagridae) in India: cleaning up taxonomic chaos. <em>Journal of Helminthology.</em> 96: 1-10., available online at https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022149x22000189 [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark From Scholz et al., 2022: [In this study] the convoluted taxonomy of tapeworms placed in Mystoides Mathur, 1992 is critically reviewed to clean up taxonomic chaos in Indo-Malayan caryophyllideans. Mystoides was erected in an unpublished PhD thesis and thus its generic name becomes unavailable and also, its type species is conspecific with Lucknowia fossilisi Gupta, 1961 from the stinging catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis (Bloch). Other species of this genus are also conspecific with L. fossilisi. In addition, specific names of most of these taxa are unavailable because they were described in unpublished theses or conference abstracts. [details]
|
