Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG taxon details

Saccotheciaceae H.F. Bonorden, 1864

11945690  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11945690)

accepted
Family

Ordering

  • Alphabetically
  • By status

Children Display

  1. Genus Aureobasidium Viala & G. Boyer, 1891
  2. Genus Banningia Y.P. Tan & G.S. Pegg, 2023
  3. Genus Columnosphaeria Munk, 1953
  4. Genus Kabatiella Bubák, 1907
  5. Genus Pseudoseptoria Spegazzini, 1910
  6. Genus Pseudosydowia K.M. Thambugala & K.D. Hyde in Ariyawansa et al., 2014
  7. Genus Saccothecium E.M. Fries, 1836
  8. Genus Selenophoma Maire, 1907
  9. Genus Aureobasis F.E. Clements & Shear, 1931 accepted as Aureobasidium Viala & G. Boyer, 1891
  10. Genus Dematoidium W. Stautz, 1931 accepted as Aureobasidium Viala & G. Boyer, 1891
  11. Genus Exobasidiopsis Karakelin, 1922 accepted as Kabatiella Bubák, 1907
  12. Genus Falcispora Bubák & Serebrianikow, 1912 accepted as Selenophoma Maire, 1907
  13. Genus Ludwigiella Petrak, 1922 accepted as Selenophoma Maire, 1907
  14. Genus Lunospora N.O. Fransden, 1943 accepted as Pseudoseptoria Spegazzini, 1910
  15. Genus Moringomyces Crous, 2020 accepted as Pseudosydowia K.M. Thambugala & K.D. Hyde in Ariyawansa et al., 2014 (unaccepted > junior subjective synonym)
  16. Genus Neopatella P.A. Saccardo in H. Sydow & P. Sydow, 1908 accepted as Selenophoma Maire, 1907
  17. Genus Pachybasidiella Bubák & H. Sydow, 1915 accepted as Aureobasidium Viala & G. Boyer, 1891
  18. Genus Phaeodothiora Petrak, 1948 accepted as Saccothecium E.M. Fries, 1836
  19. Genus Pleosphaerulina Passerini, 1891 accepted as Saccothecium E.M. Fries, 1836
  20. Genus Polyspora Lafferty, 1921 accepted as Aureobasidium Viala & G. Boyer, 1891
  21. Genus Pringsheimia S. Schulzer von Müggenburg in S. Schulzer von Müggenburg, Kanitz & Knapp, 1866 accepted as Saccothecium E.M. Fries, 1836
  22. Genus Protocoronis F.E. Clements & Shear, 1931 accepted as Aureobasidium Viala & G. Boyer, 1891
  23. Genus Protocoronospora G.F. Atkinson & Edgerton, 1907 accepted as Aureobasidium Viala & G. Boyer, 1891
  24. Genus Pseudosarcophoma Urries, 1952 accepted as Selenophoma Maire, 1907
  25. Genus Schizostege Theissen, 1917 accepted as Saccothecium E.M. Fries, 1836
  26. Genus Selenophomopsis Petrak, 1924 accepted as Selenophoma Maire, 1907
marine, brackish, fresh, terrestrial
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Family revived since 2009; at that date, the type genus Saccothecium was listed in Dothioraceae (Index Fungorum data). Doweld,...  
Taxonomic remark Family revived since 2009; at that date, the type genus Saccothecium was listed in Dothioraceae (Index Fungorum data). Doweld, 2012 proposed to conserve Dothioraceae against Saccotheciaceae, however the former name is now considered a synonym of Dothideaceae, which is a separate family from Saccotheciaceae (alternative proposed name: Aureobasidiaceae, unaccepted). [details]
IRMNG (2025). Saccotheciaceae H.F. Bonorden, 1864. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11945690 on 2025-09-11
Date
action
by
2025-04-28 20:22:57Z
created

basis of record Mycobank (2025 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] 

additional source May, T. W. (2017). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi: 20. <em>Taxon.</em> 66(2): 483-495., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/662.15
note: proposal to replace with the junior name Dothioraceae rejected, refer notes. [details] 

taxonomy source Mycobank (2025 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] 

name verified source Mycobank (2025 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] 

current name source Mycobank (2025 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] 

extant flag source Mycobank (2025 version). , available online at http://www.mycobank.org/ [details] 

original description (of Aureobasidiaceae K.M. Thambugala & K.D. Hyde in Ariyawansa et al., 2014) Ariyawansa, H. A.; Tanaka, K.; Thambugala, K. M.; Phookamsak, R.; Tian, Q.; Camporesi, E.; Hongsanan, S.; Monkai, J.; Wanasinghe, D. N.; Mapook, A.; Chukeatirote, E.; Kang, J.-C.; Xu, J.-C.; McKenzie, E. H. C.; Jones, E. B. G.; Hyde, K. D. (2014). A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Didymosphaeriaceae (= Montagnulaceae). <em>Fungal Diversity.</em> 68(1): 69-104., available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0305-6 [details] 
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Family revived since 2009; at that date, the type genus Saccothecium was listed in Dothioraceae (Index Fungorum data). Doweld, 2012 proposed to conserve Dothioraceae against Saccotheciaceae, however the former name is now considered a synonym of Dothideaceae, which is a separate family from Saccotheciaceae (alternative proposed name: Aureobasidiaceae, unaccepted). [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»