| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsAureobasidiaceae K.M. Thambugala & K.D. Hyde in Ariyawansa et al., 2014
11945691 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:11945691)
unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Family
recent only
Ariyawansa, H. A.; Tanaka, K.; Thambugala, K. M.; Phookamsak, R.; Tian, Q.; Camporesi, E.; Hongsanan, S.; Monkai, J.; Wanasinghe, D. N.; Mapook, A.; Chukeatirote, E.; Kang, J.-C.; Xu, J.-C.; McKenzie, E. H. C.; Jones, E. B. G.; Hyde, K. D. (2014). A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Didymosphaeriaceae (= Montagnulaceae). <em>Fungal Diversity.</em> 68(1): 69-104., available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0305-6 [details]
Taxonomic remark From May, 2017: Aureobasidiaceae Thambug. & K.D. Hyde 2014 is an isonym of Aureobasidiaceae Cif. (in Man. Mic. Med., ed. 2,...
Taxonomic remark From May, 2017: Aureobasidiaceae Thambug. & K.D. Hyde 2014 is an isonym of Aureobasidiaceae Cif. (in Man. Mic. Med., ed. 2, 1: 178. 1958) because both names are based on Aureobasidium Viala & G. Boyer. Even with publication of Aureobasidiaceae dating from 1958, the correct name for the family that contains Aureobasidium and Saccothecium is the earlier name Saccotheciaceae, and this has recognised by Liu & al. (in Fungal Diversity 72: 159. 2015). [details]
IRMNG (2025). Aureobasidiaceae K.M. Thambugala & K.D. Hyde in Ariyawansa et al., 2014. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=11945691 on 2025-05-09
Date action by
original description
Ariyawansa, H. A.; Tanaka, K.; Thambugala, K. M.; Phookamsak, R.; Tian, Q.; Camporesi, E.; Hongsanan, S.; Monkai, J.; Wanasinghe, D. N.; Mapook, A.; Chukeatirote, E.; Kang, J.-C.; Xu, J.-C.; McKenzie, E. H. C.; Jones, E. B. G.; Hyde, K. D. (2014). A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Didymosphaeriaceae (= Montagnulaceae). <em>Fungal Diversity.</em> 68(1): 69-104., available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-014-0305-6 [details]
basis of record May, T. W. (2017). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi: 20. <em>Taxon.</em> 66(2): 483-495., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/662.15 [details] source of synonymy May, T. W. (2017). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi: 20. <em>Taxon.</em> 66(2): 483-495., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/662.15 [details] taxonomy source May, T. W. (2017). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi: 20. <em>Taxon.</em> 66(2): 483-495., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/662.15 [details] name verified source May, T. W. (2017). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi: 20. <em>Taxon.</em> 66(2): 483-495., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/662.15 [details] extant flag source May, T. W. (2017). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fungi: 20. <em>Taxon.</em> 66(2): 483-495., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/662.15 [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark From May, 2017: Aureobasidiaceae Thambug. & K.D. Hyde 2014 is an isonym of Aureobasidiaceae Cif. (in Man. Mic. Med., ed. 2, 1: 178. 1958) because both names are based on Aureobasidium Viala & G. Boyer. Even with publication of Aureobasidiaceae dating from 1958, the correct name for the family that contains Aureobasidium and Saccothecium is the earlier name Saccotheciaceae, and this has recognised by Liu & al. (in Fungal Diversity 72: 159. 2015). [details]
|
