| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsStanosthetus Dejean, 1821
1220141 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1220141)
unaccepted > junior subjective synonym
Genus
Stenosthetus Griffith & Pidgeon, 1832 · unaccepted > misspelling - incorrect subsequent spelling
recent only
Dejean, P.F.M.A. (1821). <em>Catalogue de la collection de Coléoptères de M. le Baron Dejean.</em> Crevot, Paris. viii+136 pp., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11667422
page(s): 25 [details]
Taxonomic remark From Newton, 2017: A new pselaphine generic name Stanosthetus Dejean 1821: 25 was listed without description, but with a...
Taxonomic remark From Newton, 2017: A new pselaphine generic name Stanosthetus Dejean 1821: 25 was listed without description, but with a single included species “Karstenii Meg.”, which can be recognized as the species Pselaphus karstenii Reichenbach 1816: 71. Stanosthetus was subsequently considered unavailable due to the lack of a generic description (e.g., by Blackwelder 1952), but the inclusion of the available name “karstenii” makes it available according to the current Code (ICZN 1999: Art. 12.2.5). Stanosthetus has been generally overlooked in subsequent literature (e.g., by Newton and Chandler 1989), but should be added as a subjective synonym of Euplectus Kirby 1817, because its type species by monotypy (P. karstenii) is now included in the genus Euplectus. In addition, the generic name Stenosthetus, used by Griffith and Pidgeon (1831: 300) but attributed by them to Dejean, should be considered a subsequent misspelling of Stanosthetus rather than an independent name, and removed from the synonymy of Pselaphus Herbst 1791 (e.g., Newton and Chandler 1989) to accompany Stanosthetus as a synonym of Euplectus. [details]
IRMNG (2024). Stanosthetus Dejean, 1821. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1220141 on 2024-06-26
Date action by
original description
Dejean, P.F.M.A. (1821). <em>Catalogue de la collection de Coléoptères de M. le Baron Dejean.</em> Crevot, Paris. viii+136 pp., available online at https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/11667422
page(s): 25 [details] basis of record Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details] source of synonymy Newton, A. F. (2017). Nomenclatural and taxonomic changes in Staphyliniformia (Coleoptera). <em>Insecta Mundi.</em> 595: 1-52., available online at https://journals.flvc.org/mundi/article/view/0595/101137 [details] verified source for family Hallan, J. (2000-2017). Biology Catalog (2012 version), http://bug.tamu.edu/research/collection/hallan/ (as at 2012). [details] name verified source Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. , available online at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ [details] extant flag source as per synonymized taxon [details] habitat flag source as per synonymized taxon [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark From Newton, 2017: A new pselaphine generic name Stanosthetus Dejean 1821: 25 was listed without description, but with a single included species “Karstenii Meg.”, which can be recognized as the species Pselaphus karstenii Reichenbach 1816: 71. Stanosthetus was subsequently considered unavailable due to the lack of a generic description (e.g., by Blackwelder 1952), but the inclusion of the available name “karstenii” makes it available according to the current Code (ICZN 1999: Art. 12.2.5). Stanosthetus has been generally overlooked in subsequent literature (e.g., by Newton and Chandler 1989), but should be added as a subjective synonym of Euplectus Kirby 1817, because its type species by monotypy (P. karstenii) is now included in the genus Euplectus. In addition, the generic name Stenosthetus, used by Griffith and Pidgeon (1831: 300) but attributed by them to Dejean, should be considered a subsequent misspelling of Stanosthetus rather than an independent name, and removed from the synonymy of Pselaphus Herbst 1791 (e.g., Newton and Chandler 1989) to accompany Stanosthetus as a synonym of Euplectus. [details]
|
