IRMNG taxon details
original description
Mém. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat. Paris (N. S.) (C) 13 page(s): 47 [details]
basis of record
Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details]
basis of record
SN2000/McKenna & Bell, 1997 [details]
verified source for family
McKenna, M. C.; Bell, S. K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York, 631 pp. [details]
name verified source
Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details]
current name source
Brands, S. J. (compiler). (1989-2005). Systema Naturae 2000. Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2006 version). Originally available online at http://sn2000.taxonomy.nl/; for current information, refer http://taxonomicon.taxonomy.nl/ProjectDescription.aspx . [details]
extant flag source
SN2000/McKenna & Bell, 1997 [details]
original description
(of Mackennatherium Van Valen, 1965 †) Nature, Lond. 207: 435 (as Mckennatherium). [details]
original description
(of Mckennatherium Van Valen, 1965 †) Nature, Lond. 207: 435 [details]
original description
(of Diacocherus Gingerich, 1983 †) Contributions Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich. 26 (11) page(s): 238 [details]
Unreviewed
Descriptive info Fossil according to SN2000 [details]
Taxonomic remark Listen in Erinaceomorpha, as per McKenna & Bell, 1997, although as Macroscelidea in The PaleoBiology Database (2019 version) following Hooker & Russell, 2012. However Springer et al., 2018 state: "Hooker and Russell (2012) suggested that Adunator is a stem macroscelidean, but their analysis did not include any other erinaceids (or other eulipotyphlans) and it is therefore difficult to argue in favor of macroscelidean affinities based on Hooker and Russell's (2012) results." [details]
| |