| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsPalaeoconchocelis S. Campbell, J. Kazmierczak & S. Golubic, 1979 †
fossil only
Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 24: -. [405-408] [details]
Taxonomic remark Wisshak et al., 2019 note this genus as a red alga body fossil, not an ichnogenus. However they then state it to be a...
Taxonomic remark Wisshak et al., 2019 note this genus as a red alga body fossil, not an ichnogenus. However they then state it to be a synonym of Conchocelichnus, which is an ichnogenus, apparently in error. [details]
IRMNG (2023). Palaeoconchocelis S. Campbell, J. Kazmierczak & S. Golubic, 1979 †. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1242714 on 2025-01-19
Date action by
original description
Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 24: -. [405-408] [details]
current name source Wisshak, M.; Knaust, D.; Bertling, M. (2019). Bioerosion ichnotaxa: review and annotated list. <em>Facies.</em> 65: 24., available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-019-0561-8 note: as red alga body fossil, not an ichnotaxon. Validity inferred since its stated synonymy with Conchocelichnus (which is an ichnotaxon) cannot be simultaneously supported. [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Silurian (Lower Ludlovian); Bielsk Podlaski, E Poland. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark Wisshak et al., 2019 note this genus as a red alga body fossil, not an ichnogenus. However they then state it to be a synonym of Conchocelichnus, which is an ichnogenus, apparently in error. [details] Type species as cited Palaeoconchocelis starmachii [details] |
