IRMNG taxon details
original description
J Vertebr Paleontol 21 (2), 20 July page(s): 352 [details]
basis of record
Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details]
verified source for family
GBIF/Paleo Database (2011). [details]
name verified source
Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details]
current name source
Godinot, M. (2007). Primate origins: a reappraisal of historical data favoring tupaiid affinities. Pp. 83-142 in Ravosa, M.J. & Dagosto, M. (eds): Primate Origins: Adaptations and Evolution. Springer. , available online at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33507-0_4 [details]
extant flag source
Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details]
habitat flag source
as per family [details]
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark A presumed plesiadapid according to the describers, although Godinot, 2007 states: Because the posterior molar seems much more salient lingually than the preceding one, it would be important to check if the last one could not be a DP4/. If the posterior one were an M1/, it could possibly pertain to Panobius found in the same locality and having apparently a comparable size (Panobius would then appear similar to some omomyids like Trogolemur). If examination of the specimen confirmed that the posterior tooth is an M3/ (e.g., if the metacone is much lower than the paracone), other affinities would be indicated, although probably not plesiadapid. [details]
|