IRMNG taxon details
basis of record
Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ note: as fossil fungus. Authority given as Kalgutkar & Jansonius, 2000, in error. [details]
name verified source
Saxena, R. K.; Wijayawardene, N. N.; Dai, D. Q.; Hyde, K. D.; Kirk, P. M. (2021). Diversity in fossil fungal spores. <em>Mycosphere.</em> 12(1): 670-874., available online at https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/8 [details]
current name source
Saxena, R. K.; Wijayawardene, N. N.; Dai, D. Q.; Hyde, K. D.; Kirk, P. M. (2021). Diversity in fossil fungal spores. <em>Mycosphere.</em> 12(1): 670-874., available online at https://doi.org/10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/8 [details]
extant flag source
Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details]
From other sources
Taxonomic remark Authority previously given (in Index Fungorum) as Kalgutkar & Jansonius, 2000, in error. From Saxena et al., 2021: Dutta & Sah (1970), though proposed Diporipollis as a pollen genus, compared it with fungal spore genera, viz. Diporisporites Hammen (1954), Diporites Hammen (1954). Kalgutkar & Jansonius (2000), on the basis of personal communication with William C. Elsik, recognized its fungal affinity and considered it as ‘Fungi Imperfecti, Phragmosporae’. [details]
| |