| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsCyclodendron R. Kräusel in R. Kräusel & P. Range, 1928 †
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Doweld, 2012, Proposed to conserve the name Cyclodendron against the supposedly earlier published Subsigillaria and...
Taxonomic remark Doweld, 2012, Proposed to conserve the name Cyclodendron against the supposedly earlier published Subsigillaria and Eusigillaria, however the the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils decided that the latter two names were originally published as subgenera of Sigillaria and did not threaten Cyclodendron, therefore the proposal was rejected since conservation of Cyclodendron was not required (Herendeen, 2015). [details]
IRMNG (2022). Cyclodendron R. Kräusel in R. Kräusel & P. Range, 1928 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1312175 on 2024-11-24
Date action by
additional source
Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14
note: refer note [details] additional source Doweld, A. B. (2012). (2092) Proposal to conserve the name Cyclodendron against Subsigillaria and Eusigillaria (fossil Lycopodiophyta: Lepidodendropsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 61(5): 1125-1126., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615028 note: as nom. cons. prop., however see Herendeen, 2015 [details] verified source for family Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] current name source Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] Unreviewed
Descriptive info Stem; Permian; Goamus, Southwest Africa. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]Taxonomic remark Doweld, 2012, Proposed to conserve the name Cyclodendron against the supposedly earlier published Subsigillaria and Eusigillaria, however the the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils decided that the latter two names were originally published as subgenera of Sigillaria and did not threaten Cyclodendron, therefore the proposal was rejected since conservation of Cyclodendron was not required (Herendeen, 2015). [details] |
