Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG name details

Frenelites Endlicher, 1847 †

1312950  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1312950)

 unaccepted > unavailable name (nomen rejiciendum)
Genus
marine, brackish, terrestrial
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Originally interpreted as the cone of a fossil conifer; later as an angiosperm fruit (same as Crowella globosa (Bowerb.) E....  
Taxonomic remark Originally interpreted as the cone of a fossil conifer; later as an angiosperm fruit (same as Crowella globosa (Bowerb.) E. Reid & M. Chandler, 1933). Doweld, 2013 proposed to conserve the genus name Crowella over both Frenelites and Actinotrobus (all considered to be synonyms) but this proposal was rejected by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils, however a separate proposal to reject Frenelites was recommended for acceptance by the Committee (Herendeen, 2015). [details]
IRMNG (2022). Frenelites Endlicher, 1847 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1312950 on 2024-11-17
Date
action
by
2007-05-28 22:00:00Z
created
2011-12-31 23:00:00Z
changed
2019-02-19 06:37:00Z
changed
2022-05-18 07:06:25Z
changed
2022-08-08 18:58:07Z
changed

basis of record Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] 

additional source Doweld, A. B. (2013). (2191) Proposal to conserve the name Crowella against Actinostrobites and Frenelites (fossil Lauraceae). <em>Taxon.</em> 62(4): 844-844., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/624.28
note: as nom. rej. prop.; see also Doweld, 2013, proposal 2192–2193. [details] 

additional source Doweld, A. B. (2013). (2192–2193) Proposals to reject the names Solenostrobus (fossil Myrtaceae or Theaceae) and Frenelites (fossil Lauraceae). <em>Taxon.</em> 62(4): 845-846., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/624.31
note: as nom. utique rej. prop. [details] 

source of synonymy Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] 

status source Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] 

verified source for family Doweld, A. B. (2013). (2191) Proposal to conserve the name Crowella against Actinostrobites and Frenelites (fossil Lauraceae). <em>Taxon.</em> 62(4): 844-844., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/624.28 [details] 

name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] 

extant flag source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] 
Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Originally interpreted as the cone of a fossil conifer; later as an angiosperm fruit (same as Crowella globosa (Bowerb.) E. Reid & M. Chandler, 1933). Doweld, 2013 proposed to conserve the genus name Crowella over both Frenelites and Actinotrobus (all considered to be synonyms) but this proposal was rejected by the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils, however a separate proposal to reject Frenelites was recommended for acceptance by the Committee (Herendeen, 2015). [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»