| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsRuzenia O. Hilber ex A.N. Miller & Huhndorf, 2004
1314353 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1314353)
unaccepted (later usage (isonym))
Genus
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark This genus is listed as valid in Mycobank (Sep 2019) and Kirk et al., 2008 "Dictionary of the Fungi"), the reason stated...
Taxonomic remark This genus is listed as valid in Mycobank (Sep 2019) and Kirk et al., 2008 "Dictionary of the Fungi"), the reason stated elsewhere being incorrect citation of the basionym of the type species of the originally published name Ruzenia O. Hilber, 2002, however the latter is a correctable error according to Index Fungorum, which treats the originally published genus genus as valid (a change of position since the publication of Kirk et al., 2008). [details]
IRMNG (2021). Ruzenia O. Hilber ex A.N. Miller & Huhndorf, 2004. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1314353 on 2024-11-14
Date action by
basis of record
Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details]
basis of record CoL2006/Species Fungorum [details] source of synonymy Index Fungorum (2019 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] status source Index Fungorum (2019 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] verified source for family Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] name verified source Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] extant flag source Index Fungorum (May 2009 version). , available online at http://www.indexfungorum.org/ [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark This genus is listed as valid in Mycobank (Sep 2019) and Kirk et al., 2008 "Dictionary of the Fungi"), the reason stated elsewhere being incorrect citation of the basionym of the type species of the originally published name Ruzenia O. Hilber, 2002, however the latter is a correctable error according to Index Fungorum, which treats the originally published genus genus as valid (a change of position since the publication of Kirk et al., 2008). [details]
|
