IRMNG name details
additional source
Doweld, A. B. (2012). (2093) Proposal to conserve the name Pecopteris against Filicites (fossil Botryopteridiopsida (Pteridophyta)). <em>Taxon.</em> 61: 1126-1127., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615029 note: alternative nomenclatural proposal, not accepted, refer note [details]
additional source
Cleal, C. J. (2012). (2094) Proposal to reject the name Filicites (fossil Embryopsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 61(5): 1127-1127., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615030 note: as nom. utique rej. prop. [details]
source of synonymy
Cleal, C. J. (2012). (2094) Proposal to reject the name Filicites (fossil Embryopsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 61(5): 1127-1127., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615030 [details]
status source
Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details]
status source
Cleal, C. J.; Thomas, B. A. (2018). Nomenclatural status of the palaeobotanical "artificial taxa" established in Brongniart's 1822 “Classification” paper. <em>Fossil Imprint.</em> 74(1-2): 9-28., available online at https://doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0001 [details]
habitat flag source
as per family [details]
Unreviewed
Descriptive info Foliage. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]
Taxonomic remark From Cleal & Thomas, 2018: Following Schlotheim (1820), Brongniart (1822a) used this name for all fern-like fronds that could not be attributed to a living genus. Brongniart divided it into a series of sections or subgenera based mainly on pinnule shape and venation, which Sternberg (1825) subsequently raised in rank to genera (accepted by Brongniart 1828a); it is as fossil-genera that they are normally used today. However, Filicites remained a legitimate name and had the potential to interfere with the currently accepted nomenclature. Doweld (2012) designated the holotype of Filicites (sect. Pecopteris) penniformis as the type of Filicites and then proposed that the generic name Pecopteris should be conserved over Filicites. Cleal (2012) instead proposed the simpler solution that Filicites should be supressed: this was supported by the IAPT Fossil Plant Committee and eventually accepted by the 2017 International Botanical Congress at Shenzen. Although originally erected for any "fern like" fossil foliage, Doweld's (2012) designation of Filicites (sect. Pecopteris) penniformis as type renders this name a synonym of Pecopteris, in fam. Asterothecaceae. [details]
|