Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG name details

Filicites Schlotheim ex A.T. Brongniart, 1822 †

1334309  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1334309)

 unaccepted > unavailable name (nomen utique rejiciendum)
Genus
marine, brackish, terrestrial
fossil only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark From Cleal & Thomas, 2018: Following Schlotheim (1820), Brongniart (1822a) used this name for all fern-like fronds that...  
Taxonomic remark From Cleal & Thomas, 2018: Following Schlotheim (1820), Brongniart (1822a) used this name for all fern-like fronds that could not be attributed to a living genus. Brongniart divided it into a series of sections or subgenera based mainly on pinnule shape and venation, which Sternberg (1825) subsequently raised in rank to genera (accepted by Brongniart 1828a); it is as fossil-genera that they are normally used today. However, Filicites remained a legitimate name and had the potential to interfere with the currently accepted nomenclature. Doweld (2012) designated the holotype of Filicites (sect. Pecopteris) penniformis as the type of Filicites and then proposed that the generic name Pecopteris should be conserved over Filicites. Cleal (2012) instead proposed the simpler solution that Filicites should be supressed: this was supported by the IAPT Fossil Plant Committee and eventually accepted by the 2017 International Botanical Congress at Shenzen. Although originally erected for any "fern like" fossil foliage, Doweld's (2012) designation of Filicites (sect. Pecopteris) penniformis as type renders this name a synonym of Pecopteris, in fam. Asterothecaceae. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Filicites Schlotheim ex A.T. Brongniart, 1822 †. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1334309 on 2024-11-20
Date
action
by
2007-05-28 22:00:00Z
created
2011-12-31 23:00:00Z
changed
2019-02-19 06:37:00Z
changed
2022-05-18 07:06:25Z
changed
2022-07-22 18:22:36Z
changed
2022-08-08 18:58:07Z
changed

additional source Doweld, A. B. (2012). (2093) Proposal to conserve the name Pecopteris against Filicites (fossil Botryopteridiopsida (Pteridophyta)). <em>Taxon.</em> 61: 1126-1127., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615029
note: alternative nomenclatural proposal, not accepted, refer note [details] 

additional source Cleal, C. J. (2012). (2094) Proposal to reject the name Filicites (fossil Embryopsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 61(5): 1127-1127., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615030
note: as nom. utique rej. prop. [details] 

source of synonymy Cleal, C. J. (2012). (2094) Proposal to reject the name Filicites (fossil Embryopsida). <em>Taxon.</em> 61(5): 1127-1127., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.615030 [details] 

status source Herendeen, P. S. (2015). Report of the Nomenclature Committee on Fossils: 9. <em>Taxon.</em> 64(6): 1306-1312., available online at https://doi.org/10.12705/646.14 [details] 

status source Cleal, C. J.; Thomas, B. A. (2018). Nomenclatural status of the palaeobotanical "artificial taxa" established in Brongniart's 1822 “Classification” paper. <em>Fossil Imprint.</em> 74(1-2): 9-28., available online at https://doi.org/10.2478/if-2018-0001 [details] 

habitat flag source as per family [details] 
Unreviewed
Descriptive info Foliage. (Index Nominum Genericorum) [details]

Taxonomic remark From Cleal & Thomas, 2018: Following Schlotheim (1820), Brongniart (1822a) used this name for all fern-like fronds that could not be attributed to a living genus. Brongniart divided it into a series of sections or subgenera based mainly on pinnule shape and venation, which Sternberg (1825) subsequently raised in rank to genera (accepted by Brongniart 1828a); it is as fossil-genera that they are normally used today. However, Filicites remained a legitimate name and had the potential to interfere with the currently accepted nomenclature. Doweld (2012) designated the holotype of Filicites (sect. Pecopteris) penniformis as the type of Filicites and then proposed that the generic name Pecopteris should be conserved over Filicites. Cleal (2012) instead proposed the simpler solution that Filicites should be supressed: this was supported by the IAPT Fossil Plant Committee and eventually accepted by the 2017 International Botanical Congress at Shenzen. Although originally erected for any "fern like" fossil foliage, Doweld's (2012) designation of Filicites (sect. Pecopteris) penniformis as type renders this name a synonym of Pecopteris, in fam. Asterothecaceae. [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»