Intro | Search taxa | Taxon tree | Search literature | Taxon match | Homonyms | Statistics | Webservice | Manual | FAQ | LifeWatch | Download | Log in

IRMNG name details

Schistidium S.E. Bridel, 1818

1372722  (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1372722)

 unaccepted (nom. rej.)
Genus
marine, brackish, terrestrial
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark nom. rej. vs. Schistidium Bruch & Schimper 1845 (nom. cons.) (Index Nominum Genericorum). Year given in WoRMS as 1819....  
Taxonomic remark nom. rej. vs. Schistidium Bruch & Schimper 1845 (nom. cons.) (Index Nominum Genericorum). Year given in WoRMS as 1819. Bridel's original taxonomic concept for this genus was confused and the genus was redefined in 1845 by Bruch & Schimper, whose version of the name (with new type) has been accepted as a nom. cons. (refer taxonomic appendices to Tokyo Code and successors), although many authors still incorrectly attribute this genus to Bridel. [details]
IRMNG (2023). Schistidium S.E. Bridel, 1818. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1372722 on 2024-11-21
Date
action
by
2007-05-28 22:00:00Z
created
2011-12-31 23:00:00Z
changed
2016-08-29 10:21:38Z
changed
2016-11-22 09:43:47Z
changed
db_admin
2017-08-23 20:01:00Z
changed
2017-09-18 06:14:51Z
changed

additional source Ochyra, R.; Isoviita, P. (1989). Proposal to conserve Schistidium (Musci, Grimmiaceae) with a new type. <em>Taxon.</em> 38:665-669., available online at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1222665 [details] 

source of synonymy Tropicos (2017 version). Available at http://www.tropicos.org/. [details] 

verified source for family WoRMS (Mar 2013) [details] 

habitat flag source as per family (most nonmarine) [details] 
Unreviewed
Nomenclatural status nomen rejiciendum [details]

Taxonomic remark nom. rej. vs. Schistidium Bruch & Schimper 1845 (nom. cons.) (Index Nominum Genericorum). Year given in WoRMS as 1819. Bridel's original taxonomic concept for this genus was confused and the genus was redefined in 1845 by Bruch & Schimper, whose version of the name (with new type) has been accepted as a nom. cons. (refer taxonomic appendices to Tokyo Code and successors), although many authors still incorrectly attribute this genus to Bridel. [details]

This service is powered by LifeWatch Belgium
Learn more»