| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG taxon detailsLeptopteris K.B. Presl, 1845
recent only
Not documented
Taxonomic remark Recommended as nom. cons., vs. Leptopteris Brongniart, 1829 (fossil ferns. From Herendeen, 2021: Brongniart established the...
Taxonomic remark Recommended as nom. cons., vs. Leptopteris Brongniart, 1829 (fossil ferns. From Herendeen, 2021: Brongniart established the genus Leptopteris Brongn. in 1829, providing a single illustration and a diagnostic statement in a key in his outline of the classification of fossil ferns. The genus was evidently abandoned by Brongniart since no species were described under this name, either in the protologue or subsequently. Although Leptopteris Brongn. is a disused and forgotten generic name, the name was validly published and therefore constitutes an obstacle to the continued use of its illegitimate later homonym, Leptopteris C. Presl for extant osmundaceous ferns. ... The Committee voted unanimously to support the proposal because the older name is unused and forgotten. [details]
IRMNG (2023). Leptopteris K.B. Presl, 1845. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1374098 on 2024-07-04
Date action by
basis of record
SN2000/Mickel, 1982 [details]
basis of record Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] additional source Doweld, A. B. (2019). (2683) Proposal to conserve the name Leptopteris C. Presl (Osmundaceae, Pteridophyta) against Leptopteris Brongn. (Fossil Plants). <em>Taxon.</em> 68(2): 411-411., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12044 note: as nom. cons. prop., versus Leptopteris Brongniart, 1829, nom. rej. prop. [details] verified source for family GRIN Taxonomy for Plants: U.S. National Plant Germplasm Resources Information Network, September 2011 version. Available online at https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomyquery.aspx. [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] current name source Herendeen, P. S. (2021). Report of the Nomenclature Committee for Fossils: 14. <em>Taxon.</em> 70(3): 670-673., available online at https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.12520 note: recommended as nom. cons., vs. Leptopteris Brongniart, 1829 (fossil ferns) [details] extant flag source GRIN Taxonomy for Plants: U.S. National Plant Germplasm Resources Information Network, September 2011 version. Available online at https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomyquery.aspx. [details] habitat flag source as per family [details] From other sources
Taxonomic remark Recommended as nom. cons., vs. Leptopteris Brongniart, 1829 (fossil ferns. From Herendeen, 2021: Brongniart established the genus Leptopteris Brongn. in 1829, providing a single illustration and a diagnostic statement in a key in his outline of the classification of fossil ferns. The genus was evidently abandoned by Brongniart since no species were described under this name, either in the protologue or subsequently. Although Leptopteris Brongn. is a disused and forgotten generic name, the name was validly published and therefore constitutes an obstacle to the continued use of its illegitimate later homonym, Leptopteris C. Presl for extant osmundaceous ferns. ... The Committee voted unanimously to support the proposal because the older name is unused and forgotten. [details]
|
