| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsAmphitholus F. Schütt, 1895
1378856 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1378856)
unaccepted (nomen rejiciendum)
Genus
marine,
recent only
Ergeb. Plankton-Exp., 4, Ma A
page(s): 34 [details]
Taxonomic remark Amphilothus was introduced as a lapsus for Amphitholus F. Schutt by Kofoid (1907: 165, 206). Realizing that Amphitholus was...
Taxonomic remark Amphilothus was introduced as a lapsus for Amphitholus F. Schutt by Kofoid (1907: 165, 206). Realizing that Amphitholus was preoccupied in zoological nomenclature, Poche (1913) adopted Amphilothus as a substitute name. Although Amphitholus is not preoccupied in botanical nomenclature, to avoid future confusion the ICBN has conserved Amphilothus as the correct name for this taxon, refer Silva, 1994 and ICBN, 1999, Appendix IIIA. Gómez, 2017 re-studied Achradina, Amphilothus and Monaster and concluded that the three genera/species represented the same taxon, with the name Monaster having priority. [details]
IRMNG (2022). Amphitholus F. Schütt, 1895. Accessed at: https://irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1378856 on 2024-11-09
Date action by 2016-11-22 09:43:47Z changed db_admin
original description
Ergeb. Plankton-Exp., 4, Ma A
page(s): 34 [details] basis of record Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] basis of record Fensome, R.A., Taylor, F.J.R., Norris, G., Sarjeant, W.A.S., Wharton, D.I. & Williams, G.L. (1993). A Classification of Living and Fossil Dinoflagellates. Micropaleontology Special Publication 7, 350pp. [details] basis of record Neave, S. A. and successors. (1939-2004). Nomenclator Zoologicus, vols. 1-10 online. [developed by uBio, hosted online at MBLWHOI Library]. Previously at http://ubio.org/NomenclatorZoologicus/ (URL no longer current). , available online at https://insecta.bio.spbu.ru/z/nomenclator_zoologicus_PDF.htm [details] source of synonymy Gómez, F. (2017). Synonymy of dinoflagellates with basket-like endoskeletons: Monaster, Amphilothus and Achradina (Amphilothales, Dinophyceae). <em>CICIMAR Oceánides.</em> 32(2): 1., available online at https://doi.org/10.37543/oceanides.v32i2.202 [details] verified source for family WoRMS (Mar 2013) [details] name verified source Farr, E. R.; Zijlstra, G. (eds). (1996-current). Index Nominum Genericorum (ING). A compilation of generic names published for organisms covered by the ICN: International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants. [previously: organisms covered by the International Code for Botanical Nomenclature] (2007 version). , available online at https://naturalhistory2.si.edu/botany/ing/ [details] extant flag source Fensome, R.A., Taylor, F.J.R., Norris, G., Sarjeant, W.A.S., Wharton, D.I. & Williams, G.L. (1993). A Classification of Living and Fossil Dinoflagellates. Micropaleontology Special Publication 7, 350pp. [details] habitat flag source Fensome, R.A., Taylor, F.J.R., Norris, G., Sarjeant, W.A.S., Wharton, D.I. & Williams, G.L. (1993). A Classification of Living and Fossil Dinoflagellates. Micropaleontology Special Publication 7, 350pp. [details] Unreviewed
Taxonomic remark Amphilothus was introduced as a lapsus for Amphitholus F. Schutt by Kofoid (1907: 165, 206). Realizing that Amphitholus was preoccupied in zoological nomenclature, Poche (1913) adopted Amphilothus as a substitute name. Although Amphitholus is not preoccupied in botanical nomenclature, to avoid future confusion the ICBN has conserved Amphilothus as the correct name for this taxon, refer Silva, 1994 and ICBN, 1999, Appendix IIIA. Gómez, 2017 re-studied Achradina, Amphilothus and Monaster and concluded that the three genera/species represented the same taxon, with the name Monaster having priority. [details]
|
