| Intro | | Search taxa | | Taxon tree | | Search literature | | Taxon match | | Homonyms | | Statistics | | Webservice | | Manual | | FAQ | | LifeWatch | | Download | | Log in |
IRMNG name detailsCyatholithus Huxley, 1868
1464810 (urn:lsid:irmng.org:taxname:1464810)
unaccepted
Genus
marine
recent only
Trans. Roy. Micros. Soc, 15
page(s): 206 [details]
Taxonomic remark Name suppressed for priority but not homonymy (ICZN Opinion 805, 1967). Huxley, 1868 proposed both "Discolithus" and...
Taxonomic remark Name suppressed for priority but not homonymy (ICZN Opinion 805, 1967). Huxley, 1868 proposed both "Discolithus" and "Cyatholithus" as descriptive categories for coccoliths, which both Nomenclator Zoologicus and Loeblich & Tappan, 1966, treat as proposed names for genera; in ICZN Opinion 805 (1967), the ICZN apparently agreed, since Cyatholithus Huxley is suppressed in that work. However Index Nominum Genericorum considers that Discolithus (and by extension, Cyatholithus) was not a validly published generic name in Huxley's work, calling it "alleged but non-existent" (refer ING entry for Discolithina Loeblich & Tappan, 1963). [details]
IRMNG (2021). Cyatholithus Huxley, 1868. Accessed at: https://www.irmng.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1464810 on 2024-11-21
Date action by
original description
Trans. Roy. Micros. Soc, 15
page(s): 206 [details] basis of record Loeblich Jr., & Tappan, 1963 [details] additional source Silva, P. C.; Throndsen, J.; Eikrem, W. (2007). Revisiting the nomenclature of Haptophytes. <em>Phycologia.</em> 46(4): 471-475., available online at https://doi.org/10.2216/07-22.1 [details] source of synonymy Loeblich Jr., & Tappan, 1963/ICZN Opinion 805 [details] name verified source Loeblich Jr., & Tappan, 1963 [details] habitat flag source as per synonymized taxon [details] Unreviewed
Nomenclatural status unavailable [details]Taxonomic remark Name suppressed for priority but not homonymy (ICZN Opinion 805, 1967). Huxley, 1868 proposed both "Discolithus" and "Cyatholithus" as descriptive categories for coccoliths, which both Nomenclator Zoologicus and Loeblich & Tappan, 1966, treat as proposed names for genera; in ICZN Opinion 805 (1967), the ICZN apparently agreed, since Cyatholithus Huxley is suppressed in that work. However Index Nominum Genericorum considers that Discolithus (and by extension, Cyatholithus) was not a validly published generic name in Huxley's work, calling it "alleged but non-existent" (refer ING entry for Discolithina Loeblich & Tappan, 1963). [details] |
