orthographia [details]
later usage [details]
Amphiraphia cells, initially considered to represent a new family and order by the describers, are in fact the ... [details]
Authorship as given in WoRMS (2016), but possibly a later usage of Auricularia Müller, 1849, a suppressed name ... [details]
Misspelling in Pettibone (1994) when she transferred the genus to Macellicephalinae; Bathylevensteina is correct ... [details]
A nomen nudum according to A. Kroh, 2011, details in relevant WoRMS record. [details]
A nomen nudum according to WoRMS. [details]
Emended in errata to Idotaega (Nomen. Zool.) [details]
Journal issue is for 2021, however article published online in 2020, taxon has associated ZooBank LSID. [details]
Hartman Catalogue wrongly records the name as a homonym, however according to WoRMS (2016) it is a later usage of ... [details]
This genus (nomen nudum) was replaced by Pennyella Neale, 1974 (WoRMS, 2016). [details]
According to WoRMS, the spelling Raphidiophorus as used in the article title is a lapsus for the correct spelling ... [details]
Intended correct spelling (Raphidiophorus is a lapsus in article title), refer original work and note in WoRMS, 2016. [details]
Currently valid as subfamily (Spirorbinae), refer WoRMS. [details]
Original spelling Spongiobranchea; the spelling Spongiobranchaea is in prevailing usage according to WoRMS (2016) and ... [details]
This nomen nudum was replaced by Dutoitella Dingle, 1989 (information from WorMS, 2016) [details]
Literature misspelling. [details]
Record from WoRMS (2013) but presumably not a species epithet. [details]
This nomen nudum was replaced by Bathycythere Sissingh, 1971 (WoRMS, 2016) [details]